Started By
Message

re: Could injury to Saints Max Unger lead to Mark Ingram trade....link

Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:21 am to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:21 am to
fricking stupid. So you trade for a C on a 4 year deal because ours who is on a 3 year deal may miss 4-6 weeks?

I don't think we should get Mangold either, but IF we were to do something it sure in the frick would be that route over trading for someone with a large long term deal. Again, that's fricking stupid.
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21342 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:22 am to
Agree. But it would be a killer deal if we had no starting center.
Posted by GMoney2600
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
14126 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:23 am to
Agreed. I'd rather Mangold on a cheap 1 year deal, or just take our chances with Allen & Kelemete.

Seriously doubt we get rid of Ingram considering that Kamara is a rookie, & AP is 33/coming off an injury. Too many question marks without Ingram at the RB position.
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 9:26 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram