- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The pay-for-play debate
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:14 pm to Broski
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:14 pm to Broski
Will things like the IMG schools popping up help? From my understanding they are basically what academies are but focus on multiple sports (feel free to correct me). The reason football, basketball, and baseball are not held back like soccer is, I think, in large part is bc most kids play for their school team first, and their travel/club/AAU team second (at least from what I have seen). Soccer on the other hand is all about the club teams because of the lack of talent, and since nothing is free, it requires pay to play. If academies and other schools start popping up that are soccer centered (the John Curtis, Evangel, Calvary Baptist types in Louisiana football), but still have good academics, then pay to play will eventually go away.
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:30 pm to lionward2014
quote:
Will things like the IMG schools popping up help?
The US had a national youth setup with the IMG Academy in Bradenton, but that closed shop this year with all of the locally-controlled youth systems popping up all over the country.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)