- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Confirmed: Saints would have taken Mahomes if Lattimore was off the board
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:46 pm to breauxmosexual
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:46 pm to breauxmosexual
It makes me wonder if Reid tried to trade with the Saints, but were turned down, so they jumped them. There was no reason for Reid to trade for the #10 pick when they could have easily traded the Saints for the #11 to get the same QB.
1
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:53 pm to djmicrobe
quote:Well, Saints don't trade down. If any year proves it, it's this year.
tried to trade with the Saints, but were turned down, so they jumped them
Saints pick #11
#10 traded back
#12 traded back
Saints pick #32
#31 traded back
#33 was GB pick from an earlier trade back
Both Saints 1st round picks were sandwiched between trade backs (3) or a pick (33) that was a result of a trade back.
I'd have a hard time believing Saints were simply excluded from trade back conversations at #11. #32 was a different beast, but #32 is a prime trade back spot, especially considering the guy they wanted just got picked.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News