Started By
Message
locked post

U.S. chief justice alarmed at Trump

Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:03 am
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:03 am
dis MFer, what was his excuse for upholding ACA? something like he didn't want to politicize the SC? worse SC nominee ever

LINK

quote:

U.S. chief justice alarmed at Trump administration immigration case stance

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts took issue on Wednesday with the Trump administration's stance in an immigration case, saying it could make it too easy for the government to strip people of citizenship for lying about minor infractions.

Roberts and other Supreme Court justices indicated support for a deported ethnic Serb immigrant named Divna Maslenjak over her bid to regain her U.S. citizenship after it was stripped because she falsely stated her husband had not served in the Bosnian Serb army in the 1990s after Yugoslavia's collapse.

Roberts seemed particularly concerned that the government was asserting it could revoke citizenship through criminal prosecution for trivial lies or omissions.

He noted that in the past he has exceeded the speed limit while driving. If immigrants failed to disclose that on a citizenship application form asking them to list any instances of breaking the law, they could later lose their citizenship, the conservative chief justice said.

"Now you say that if I answer that question 'no,' 20 years after I was naturalized as a citizen, you can knock on my door and say, 'Guess what, you're not an American citizen after all?'" Roberts asked Justice Department lawyer Robert Parker.

Roberts described the administration's interpretation as inviting "prosecutorial abuse" because the government could likely find a reason for stripping citizenship from most naturalized citizens.

"That to me is troublesome to give that extraordinary power, which, essentially, is unlimited power, at least in most cases, to the government," Roberts added.

President Donald Trump has sought to restrict immigration and deport people who have entered the United States illegally.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 9:08 am
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40479 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:05 am to
Chief Cuck
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:05 am to
Speeding ticket is a bit different than serving in the army.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:05 am to
frick him.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27196 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:05 am to
Uh, leaving out the fact that your husband served in the Bosnian Serb Army doesn't really constitute a "trivial lie or omission"...

What frickin planet are these people from?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68216 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:06 am to
Is Robert's interested in the Law or only his own agenda?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29008 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:06 am to
quote:

lying about minor infractions.




ummm.... don't lie and there's not a problem.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34833 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:07 am to
I'm a bit alarmed about our chief justice
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79322 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:08 am to
So the administration is continuing a position argued by Obama's DOJ at the 6th Circuit, and now Trump is doing something alarming?

This sounds more like sensationalized reporting of normal questioning by SCOTUS than it does news about Roberts' position on Trump policy
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:09 am to
If we stripped every person of citizenship who told a lie, we'd not have a president or a congress.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:


Roberts and other Supreme Court justices indicated support for a deported ethnic Serb immigrant named Divna Maslenjak over her bid to regain her U.S. citizenship after it was stripped because she falsely stated her husband had not served in the Bosnian Serb army in the 1990s after Yugoslavia's collapse.

Roberts seemed particularly concerned that the government was asserting it could revoke citizenship through criminal prosecution for trivial lies or omissions.

He noted that in the past he has exceeded the speed limit while driving. If immigrants failed to disclose that on a citizenship application form asking them to list any instances of breaking the law, they could later lose their citizenship, the conservative chief justice said.

"Now you say that if I answer that question 'no,' 20 years after I was naturalized as a citizen, you can knock on my door and say, 'Guess what, you're not an American citizen after all?'" Roberts asked Justice Department lawyer Robert Parker.

Roberts described the administration's interpretation as inviting "prosecutorial abuse" because the government could likely find a reason for stripping citizenship from most naturalized citizens.


While I don't completely disagree with Roberts here, technically if the law says (I don't know if it does) that lying on your citizenship application means possibility of it being stripped, then to go back and say 'its unfair, so we're going to re-write the law' is exactly the wrong answer.

Roberts worries me more than any of the other justices that he is going to end up being a Souter.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35005 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:11 am to
I'd like to hear Roberts explain in Constitutional language, his Lawful reasoning re the ACA 'tax/penalty' scenario.

Though I do agree that employing minor/trumped-up offenses to inflict major punitive damage to an opponent is problematic. I'm thinking of D'nesh D'Sousa, and how Obama put him in jail for a common tax/political contribution issue.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22260 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

"That to me is troublesome to give that extraordinary power, which, essentially, is unlimited power, at least in most cases, to the government," Roberts added.

Robert's make a good point. You libertarians should be in agreement.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99150 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:12 am to
Wow!

Within the 1st hundred days, Trump actually has a case being argued at the Supreme Court!!!!

Oh, wait...this would stem from immigration actions occurring under a previous administration and it, and Roberts' statements, have NOTHING to do with Trump.

And to be clear, I hate Roberts.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:12 am to
How dare the Supreme Court question the government's position in oral arguments, this is unprecedented
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Roberts seemed particularly concerned that the government was asserting it could revoke citizenship through criminal prosecution for trivial lies or omissions.


quote:

she falsely stated her husband had not served in the Bosnian Serb army in the 1990s after Yugoslavia's collapse


Bosnian Genocide
quote:

The ethnic cleansing campaign that took place throughout areas controlled by the Bosnian Serbs targeted Muslim Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats. The ethnic cleansing campaign included unlawful confinement, murder, rape, sexual assault, torture, beating, robbery, and inhumane treatment of civilians; the targeting of political leaders, intellectuals, and professionals; the unlawful deportation and transfer of civilians; the unlawful shelling of civilians; the unlawful appropriation and plunder of real and personal property; the destruction of homes and businesses; and the destruction of places of worship


I mean she is not her husband nor is she necessarily responsible for any actions he may have been a part of. But I wouldn't call that a "trivial omission."
Your spouse's involvement in a war doesn't slip your mind. Especially a controversial one involving war crimes.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 9:19 am
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

she falsely stated her husband had not served in the Bosnian Serb army in the 1990s after Yugoslavia's collapse.

quote:

for trivial lies or omissions.


If you didn't know:

quote:

The ethnic cleansing campaign that took place throughout areas controlled by the Bosnian Serbs targeted Muslim Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats. The ethnic cleansing campaign included unlawful confinement, murder, rape, sexual assault, torture, beating, robbery, and inhumane treatment of civilians; the targeting of political leaders, intellectuals, and professionals; the unlawful deportation and transfer of civilians; the unlawful shelling of civilians; the unlawful appropriation and plunder of real and personal property; the destruction of homes and businesses; and the destruction of places of worship.

In the 1990s, several authorities asserted that ethnic cleansing as carried out by elements of the Bosnian Serb army was genocide. These included a resolution by the United Nations General Assembly and three convictions for genocide in German courts (the convictions were based upon a wider interpretation of genocide than that used by international courts). In 2005, the United States Congress passed a resolution declaring that "the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide".


quote:

for trivial lies or omissions.

Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20134 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:23 am to
Alarmed at Trump? That's your headline? Come on man. How long has that case been in the court system to have landed before the USSC?

His point is valid and maybe it's an important issue. What constitutes minor vs serious dishonesty/perjury in citizenship applications, and is there a consideration for how long ago it happened. There is no need to make that legal question a political bully pulpit.

The job of the DOJ is to enforce the law and to make reasonable interpretations. There are going to be disagreements and different interpretations and this is the process by which those issues are resolved.

I doubt Trump has any direct involvement in this at all.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

U.S. chief justice alarmed at Trump

quote:

Maslenjak's citizenship was revoked. She and her husband were deported to Serbia last October.


:|
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67497 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:33 am to
Roberts needs to understand what his fricking job is and it's NOT speculating on what MAY happen 20 years from now.....hey John, your job is to make sure a law is IAW the Constitution to a-hole.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram