- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mayock goes with ...
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:25 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:25 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
yikes? go watch his tape, pls
i think he is one of the 5-6 guys that will be in play for us
For someone knocking Barnett for athleticism, Harris has EXTREMELY similar numbers, but a much worse 3 cone. Harris had a better 40 by .06, but Barnett had a better broad by 8 inches.
And Barnett blows him away in production. And is heavier.
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 8:29 pm
2
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:34 pm to bonethug0108
Harris came back strong at his pro day
37.5" vert
9'10" broad
7.05 3 Cone
Which match the explosion off the ball that you see on tape
That being said I never said I favored one or the other.
37.5" vert
9'10" broad
7.05 3 Cone
Which match the explosion off the ball that you see on tape
That being said I never said I favored one or the other.
Posted on 4/26/17 at 9:13 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
For someone knocking Barnett for athleticism, Harris has EXTREMELY similar numbers, but a much worse 3 cone. Harris had a better 40 by .06, but Barnett had a better broad by 8 inches.
And Barnett blows him away in production. And is heavier.
finally, someone with some fricking sense... and i'm not the biggest Barnett fan, either, but if you take Charles goddamn Harris at #11, over Hooker, Barnett, etc, then you deserve everything that you get as a result....
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News