Started By
Message

re: FCC announces plan to reverse Title II net neutrality

Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

True or false - your ISP should have full legal authority to block your access to any website without a valid reason.
I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4541 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.


Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:11 pm to
Most Americans have little to no choice of ISP. That is not a free market.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10480 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.



Most people do not have another choice for another ISP. I live in a major metro area and have one choice - Charter. If I moved to the other side of the city I would still have one choice, but it would be with Comcast. In Baton Rouge, or anywhere in Louisiana, your only actual option is Cox. DSL is a far slower technology that simply can't compete.

So that's the reality. What happens when the handful of mega ISPs start requiring you to pay $150+ per month for the "full tier" internet package that allows you to visit any website you want, while all other cheaper internet packages block access to most sites, such as this one?

The market can't punish them because there is no market.

Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.


A huge majority of people have one option when it comes to high speed internet. There is no free market.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's


A lot of municipalities only have one or two ISPs and it's almost impossible for anyone else to compete (including Google). My prediction is that the consumer is going to get gang raped by the ISPs.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.


In most areas of the country, internet providers have exclusive deals with the small towns they serve. While its getting better, its not like you can drive up the street and get a different provider if you don't like your current one.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72169 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.
Yea, with all the ISPs being available in every city or state.

If these ISPs didn't have local monopolies, your point would stand.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125444 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.


except when you live in an area when one ISP has a monopoly.....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram