Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 4/19/17 at 11:26 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37733 posts
Posted on 4/19/17 at 11:26 pm to
Jong-un, or whatever his fatass name is, doesn't want to give up his power and die in the process. So you can forget the nukes.

We're no doubt working on a way to take out their arty in one fell stroke ... which is gonna be tough but I have no doubt that where there is a will there is a way.

I've been to the DMZ. Any way we cut it, it will not be pretty. People are gonna die and lots of them.

If we go, we gotta go all the way and it would be very costly.

It'll be costlier if we continue to let him develop his nukes and delivery systems.

If China is not on board with us, ready to take over in NK once a certain point is reached, then everyone is fricked but look at it this way ... does China really want to lose their cash cow over some sociopathic nutjob? Answer: Probably not.

This has been coming for the better part of fifty years. Carter let them have one of our guys up in '79 or '80 ... with an axe. He should have ended it then but, as usual with the libtard fricks he looked the other way. You also had the Pueblo incident under LBJ.

I mean it's just time to change things ... time to end that particular gene pool.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram