Started By
Message

re: Why was Furniss' # retired before Walker?

Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:00 pm to
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60660 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:00 pm to
Furniss > Walker
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14509 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:02 pm to
That's debatable. And Walker was the OGOAT
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Furniss > Walker


Nope
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24459 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 5:08 pm to
Both were great hitters. Walker was as clutch as there was in big moments.

Both graduated.

You could have projected Walker's stats had he stayed to see how close they would have been. Walker likely bats >.400.
Dude had a .289 MLB avg which isn't too shabby. Eddie just didn't have the same level of success far enough in the minors.
I'll go with Walker>Furniss since he made the bigs and did it for 12 years.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67592 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 5:38 pm to
if Walker played his senior year and improved his stats like Furniss did this wouldn't even be debateable. We have never had a more clutch hitter than Walker.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram