Started By
Message

re: Obviously the DOJ has to bring charges against Rice, right?

Posted on 4/3/17 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35474 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 4:50 pm to
For doing her job?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119032 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

For doing her job?


Wait, unmasking U.S. citizens in the course of surveillance and leaking those names to the media is in her job description?

Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

For doing her job?


You're such a failure.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

For doing her job?

Pretty sure unmasking and disseminating a conversation between Trump and the Australian PM and Mexican President isn't part of "her job".

And I'm also pretty sure that when she does unmask Americans in incidental intercepts, that safeguarding that classified intelligence IS part of "her job".

Are you suggesting that she isn't accountable for classified intelligence she unmasked somehow finding its way to the media?

In what world is she not responsible for safeguarding classified materials that she secured?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram