Started By
Message

re: Mike Edmondson to get $128K retirement--state tax free--age 58

Posted on 3/29/17 at 11:52 am to
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 11:52 am to
Clearly you can not read the link and certainly it is not a list of places people are seeking to move for retirement--the move there for their career---

quote:

The proportion of those age 65 and older in Raleigh-Cary, N.C., has increased by 60 percent since 2000, the largest uptick of any metro area in the United States. And three Texas cities, Austin, Houston, and Dallas, are among the places with the fastest-growing senior citizen populations. Many cities out West are also home to rapidly growing retiree populations, including Las Vegas, Nev., Boise, Idaho, Provo, Utah, and Colorado Springs, Colo. Only five metro areas registered declines in their numbers of senior citizens: Scranton, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Buffalo, and Youngstown.

Often, people are choosing to spend their retirement years in places where they spent the final years of their career. "Most of the country is increasing its over-age-45 population simply because people are aging in place," says William Frey, a Brookings Institution senior fellow and author of the report. While some people move to designated retirement communities once they leave their jobs, most people don't. "There is some movement among the retired population, but it's not that huge and people who move typically move locally," says Frey. "Florida is the outlier. In the rest of these places the migration is occurring among people under age 45."


The article makes my point not yours. You guys should quit posting if this is the best you got.

We all understand your point---you want government retirees to be treated different that the rest of the population, the commoners.

This post was edited on 3/29/17 at 11:56 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89736 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

We all understand your point-


I'm not sure that you do.

quote:

you want government retirees to be treated different that the rest of the population, the commoners.


I'm not going to argue against you on the fact that Edmondson got a sweet deal. But, retirees are in demand.

Why? They have disposable income, they're relatively more affluent than the average citizen, they're not associated with crime, and they tend to wilfully concentrate as they age (downsize/condo/retirement centers). Anything you can do to attract them is going to give you an advantage. Anything you do (intentionally or not) that increases their financial burden of living in your area will push them elsewhere.

This is basic economics. This is why I always rail at Marxism/Progressivism - if you want more of something, subsidize it (they want to subsidize poverty and sloth). If you want less of something, tax and regulate it (they want to do that to producers, achievers and employers).

Bass ackwards.
This post was edited on 3/29/17 at 9:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram