Started By
Message

re: End Occupational Licensing---a protectionist barrier to work for many

Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:57 am to
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10680 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:57 am to
You can make a good argument for a licensed barber in that they have to sterilize their instruments between customers, they need to know basic safety and first aid if they are going to give you a shave and cut your hair with razor and knives.

I believe that if you let anyone call themselves a barber just by putting up a sign you will run into problems. A license says that they have met certain industry standards and state standards for safety and performance.

You need a driver's license so it makes sense that someone who deals with razors and scissors has a license showing that have met and passed exams about basic sanitation and safety and yes knows how to give a haircut and shave.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55518 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:59 am to
quote:

You can make a good argument for a licensed barber in that they have to sterilize their instruments between customers, they need to know basic safety and first aid if they are going to give you a shave and cut your hair with razor and knives.



And the only possible way they can know this is if they are licensed.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83953 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:01 am to
And barbers/stylists fall under the Department of Health for each state typically. They are in contact with skin and hair, all which can transmit disease/bacteria/viruses. I'm not saying it's necessary, but that's why it is handled the way it is.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:02 am to
quote:

You can make a good argument for a licensed barber in that they have to sterilize their instruments between customers, they need to know basic safety and first aid if they are going to give you a shave and cut your hair with razor and knives.



Well we do quite well without licensing electric equipment manufacturers or computer manufacturers or even rocket manufacturers.

Barbers should have a trade group that certifies their members or something. No need to have the law reduce competition. Such a trade group could market the skill of their members in hopes of convincing people to use a member barber instead of some one else when they need a hair cut.

There are a lot of people who cut hair in their home that is not licensed. Have you ever heard of any one being arrested? of any one being harmed beyond a bad haircut by such individuals?
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19311 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:

You can make a good argument for a licensed barber in that they have to sterilize their instruments between customers, they need to know basic safety and first aid if they are going to give you a shave and cut your hair with razor and knives.


I agree in dealing with some professions. But do you need 1,500 hours in cosmetology training to learn that?

Oh, and most of the styles they're required to learn--unless all your clientele are 70 or older you'll never use it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram