- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: End Occupational Licensing---a protectionist barrier to work for many
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:54 am to GRTiger
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:54 am to GRTiger
quote:
Who DV'd me for asking a question?
I'm pretty sure the answer is that you have to have one.
LA has some ridiculous amount of hours/training to be a licensed florist. It's absolutely fricking retarded and it keeps the labor/supply pool artifically low, protects existing florists, and raises prices for consumers. This is true for every single other occupation that requires licensure.
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:58 am to HempHead
Louisiana is the only state that licenses florist too.
When Jindal got to office this became a minor controversy as there was a lawsuit about it. Jindal got on his soapbox about freedom and stuff and said he was going to stop it. All he did was sign a testing procedure--a small example of his phony commitment to individual freedom and small government.
BTW the state republican chairman for years was Roger Villere, a florist.
When Jindal got to office this became a minor controversy as there was a lawsuit about it. Jindal got on his soapbox about freedom and stuff and said he was going to stop it. All he did was sign a testing procedure--a small example of his phony commitment to individual freedom and small government.
BTW the state republican chairman for years was Roger Villere, a florist.
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:58 am to HempHead
quote:But even of there is a line somewhere (physicians, etc.), based on safety, liability, etc., where does a state get the idea florists should be included?
LA has some ridiculous amount of hours/training to be a licensed florist. It's absolutely fricking retarded and it keeps the labor/supply pool artifically low, protects existing florists, and raises prices for consumers. This is true for every single other occupation that requires licensure.
Why not grocery baggers while we're at it?
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 9:59 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News