- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: isnt the titans #18 a better offer then just getting Malcolm Butler from pats?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 6:34 pm to bonethug0108
Posted on 3/10/17 at 6:34 pm to bonethug0108
I was for it because of the deep defensive class, especially since we didn't address another CB.
However, with him, Ginn, Thomas and Snead and now a more stable line with Warford, we will look unstoppable.
CB and DE were still our most needed and we didn't attempt either in FA, which is concerning
However, with him, Ginn, Thomas and Snead and now a more stable line with Warford, we will look unstoppable.
CB and DE were still our most needed and we didn't attempt either in FA, which is concerning
1
Posted on 3/10/17 at 6:41 pm to WicKed WayZ
I was never really for or against it. My only question was what will it be for.
If it was a great deal then send him packaging. If not then frick you other teams we're keeping him.
So far the closest thing I've liked that is even semi legit is Butler and 32 for Cooks and 42, but that doesn't blow me away.
The pool of 10 extra players to pick from is nice, and getting a fifth year option is really good, and we could use a proven CB.
On the other hand having that guy that can take the top off or bust a screen or slant for a big one is nice. It would stagnate our offense to lose him (though Ginn can somewhat help in that department now that we have him).
But having two deep threats REALLY stretches the field. See 2009.
If it was a great deal then send him packaging. If not then frick you other teams we're keeping him.
So far the closest thing I've liked that is even semi legit is Butler and 32 for Cooks and 42, but that doesn't blow me away.
The pool of 10 extra players to pick from is nice, and getting a fifth year option is really good, and we could use a proven CB.
On the other hand having that guy that can take the top off or bust a screen or slant for a big one is nice. It would stagnate our offense to lose him (though Ginn can somewhat help in that department now that we have him).
But having two deep threats REALLY stretches the field. See 2009.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News