- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why is keeping children on parent's plan till 26 so popular?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:16 pm
I mean, I get why it's a good thing but if any costly portion of the plan should be given up, wouldn't it be that? If a person can't secure a decent job by the age of 26...isn't that a little late? Even if someone goes to college, they are done by that time. What is going on with this particular part of the plan? Is it even a costly part of the plan? One would think not since 26 y/o are usually young & healthy.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to Cali 4 LSU
I can't figure that out either. If you are 26 and still sucking from your mom's teet, you have already failed at life.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to Cali 4 LSU
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/8/21 at 11:27 am
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Yet another reason Obamacare will never be repealed.
Republicans benefit too much from it and this is a perfect example.
Ask people if you know if they do this and then ask them why they raised lazy children.
Republicans benefit too much from it and this is a perfect example.
Ask people if you know if they do this and then ask them why they raised lazy children.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:19 pm to Cali 4 LSU
The thing is 99 percent of 26 year olds should be on catastrophic plans with 10k plus deductibles. Not on these ridiculous cover everything plans.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:24 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Lot of dumb fricks in here that think the job market is the same as it was in the 80s.
Most good jobs now require a year or two of apprentice, unpaid work. So now you're 24 or 25 when you make your first full time salary. Not exactly easy to get fully on your feet, financially, especially if paying off student loans.
Most good jobs now require a year or two of apprentice, unpaid work. So now you're 24 or 25 when you make your first full time salary. Not exactly easy to get fully on your feet, financially, especially if paying off student loans.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:25 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Michael Berry had an expert on his show this evening explaining the details of the new plan, both positives and negatives. Though it is a bit ridiculous, to cover children until they are 26 only makes up about 1% of the costs.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:26 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Heck if I know, everything else is either 18 or 21. Is foolhardy and will be blasted for saying so
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:30 pm to Cali 4 LSU
A) Because most parents probably don't care to pay the extra premiums (they typically aren't that high). B) The extra money is pretty good for insurance companies because they collect premium on a group of people who are highly unlikely to have claims that are higher than the collected premium. C) Younger people get to have coverage during the years when they are trying to figure their shite out. It's the rare situation where it's a win for pretty much everyone involved.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm to Cali 4 LSU
LSU has an insurance plan for full time students. I am sure other schools do also. I think it is a dumb provision.
If you are poor wouldn't you qualify for government assistance.
If you are poor wouldn't you qualify for government assistance.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Because college students and grad students are already heavily in debt due to student loans.
College is already too expensive and time intensive for them to work a job with benefits (heck they go to college to get one of those jobs)
They can't afford to purchase their own health insurance. Before Obamacare, most just went without, and if they got sick, they were either SOOL or their parents were on the hook.
College is already too expensive and time intensive for them to work a job with benefits (heck they go to college to get one of those jobs)
They can't afford to purchase their own health insurance. Before Obamacare, most just went without, and if they got sick, they were either SOOL or their parents were on the hook.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:44 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Advanced degrees? Law school, Medical school, etc. I will gladly have my son on my plan, as long as he's enrolled in a meaningful post grad degree, because he's my son.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:45 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Bc we live in a world of pussies who pamper their kids.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:52 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Is it really that costly? Let's be honest, not many 26 year olds frequent the doctor with serious medical issues, and most pay a higher rate for 2+1.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:54 pm to Cali 4 LSU
People in this and older age groups lost their jobs/ were laid off/can't find a job beyond fast food with health insurance.
There was a time not many years ago; a college kid couldn't get his same job at Lowe's loading trucks because a 40 year old man took his job.
There was a time not many years ago; a college kid couldn't get his same job at Lowe's loading trucks because a 40 year old man took his job.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:09 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Why is keeping children on parent's plan till 26 so popular?
The same reason multi-generational homes are a thing again. And that marriage and fertility rates are so low among the non-welfare classes.
Namely, that the economy is so great!
People flat-out no longer have any confidence in the future.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:14 pm to Cali 4 LSU
It should only apply if you're enrolled in college or grad school
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:42 pm to Cali 4 LSU
My kid was in Medical school until 26 and needed the coverage. Otherwise, he would have had to take out a very large private policy from the medical school. But of course your underachievers probably don't need such things to ride on that garbage truck
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:24 pm to Cali 4 LSU
i have zero issue with it.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 12:19 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
I mean, I get why it's a good thing but if any costly portion of the plan should be given up, wouldn't it be that? If a person can't secure a decent job by the age of 26...
myriad of reasons
1) They are the least expensive to treat, so its cost effective
2) They are the least likely to carry insurance, so they don't help balance the pool for the elderly
3) Parents are more willing to cough up the extended bucks for the protection, than the kids are for themselves
4) This generation is becoming lazy shits
5) This generation are coddlers who are used to participation trophies, its their right to be given free shite
6) Lots of kids are really still dependents until they finish college around 23. This just pads them a few years, to secure employment
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News