Started By
Message
locked post

Why is keeping children on parent's plan till 26 so popular?

Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:16 pm
I mean, I get why it's a good thing but if any costly portion of the plan should be given up, wouldn't it be that? If a person can't secure a decent job by the age of 26...isn't that a little late? Even if someone goes to college, they are done by that time. What is going on with this particular part of the plan? Is it even a costly part of the plan? One would think not since 26 y/o are usually young & healthy.
Posted by joeytiger
Muh Mom's House
Member since Jul 2012
6037 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to
I can't figure that out either. If you are 26 and still sucking from your mom's teet, you have already failed at life.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28351 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/8/21 at 11:27 am
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6946 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:18 pm to
Yet another reason Obamacare will never be repealed.

Republicans benefit too much from it and this is a perfect example.

Ask people if you know if they do this and then ask them why they raised lazy children.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23279 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:19 pm to
The thing is 99 percent of 26 year olds should be on catastrophic plans with 10k plus deductibles. Not on these ridiculous cover everything plans.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66474 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:24 pm to
Lot of dumb fricks in here that think the job market is the same as it was in the 80s.

Most good jobs now require a year or two of apprentice, unpaid work. So now you're 24 or 25 when you make your first full time salary. Not exactly easy to get fully on your feet, financially, especially if paying off student loans.
Posted by Ramblin Wreck
Member since Aug 2011
3899 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:25 pm to
Michael Berry had an expert on his show this evening explaining the details of the new plan, both positives and negatives. Though it is a bit ridiculous, to cover children until they are 26 only makes up about 1% of the costs.
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11541 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:26 pm to
Heck if I know, everything else is either 18 or 21. Is foolhardy and will be blasted for saying so
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted by Ingloriousbastard
Member since May 2015
917 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:30 pm to
A) Because most parents probably don't care to pay the extra premiums (they typically aren't that high). B) The extra money is pretty good for insurance companies because they collect premium on a group of people who are highly unlikely to have claims that are higher than the collected premium. C) Younger people get to have coverage during the years when they are trying to figure their shite out. It's the rare situation where it's a win for pretty much everyone involved.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22817 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm to
LSU has an insurance plan for full time students. I am sure other schools do also. I think it is a dumb provision.

If you are poor wouldn't you qualify for government assistance.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:37 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67210 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:35 pm to
Because college students and grad students are already heavily in debt due to student loans.
College is already too expensive and time intensive for them to work a job with benefits (heck they go to college to get one of those jobs)
They can't afford to purchase their own health insurance. Before Obamacare, most just went without, and if they got sick, they were either SOOL or their parents were on the hook.
Posted by dmjones
Acworth, GA
Member since Mar 2016
2303 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:44 pm to
Advanced degrees? Law school, Medical school, etc. I will gladly have my son on my plan, as long as he's enrolled in a meaningful post grad degree, because he's my son.
Posted by Ltown_tiger
Livonia
Member since Aug 2013
2014 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:45 pm to
Bc we live in a world of pussies who pamper their kids.
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:52 pm to
Is it really that costly? Let's be honest, not many 26 year olds frequent the doctor with serious medical issues, and most pay a higher rate for 2+1.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147308 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:54 pm to
People in this and older age groups lost their jobs/ were laid off/can't find a job beyond fast food with health insurance.

There was a time not many years ago; a college kid couldn't get his same job at Lowe's loading trucks because a 40 year old man took his job.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Why is keeping children on parent's plan till 26 so popular?


The same reason multi-generational homes are a thing again. And that marriage and fertility rates are so low among the non-welfare classes.

Namely, that the economy is so great!

People flat-out no longer have any confidence in the future.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90876 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:14 pm to
It should only apply if you're enrolled in college or grad school
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
9940 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:42 pm to
My kid was in Medical school until 26 and needed the coverage. Otherwise, he would have had to take out a very large private policy from the medical school. But of course your underachievers probably don't need such things to ride on that garbage truck
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25166 posts
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:24 pm to
i have zero issue with it.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 12:19 am to
quote:

I mean, I get why it's a good thing but if any costly portion of the plan should be given up, wouldn't it be that? If a person can't secure a decent job by the age of 26...

myriad of reasons

1) They are the least expensive to treat, so its cost effective

2) They are the least likely to carry insurance, so they don't help balance the pool for the elderly

3) Parents are more willing to cough up the extended bucks for the protection, than the kids are for themselves

4) This generation is becoming lazy shits

5) This generation are coddlers who are used to participation trophies, its their right to be given free shite

6) Lots of kids are really still dependents until they finish college around 23. This just pads them a few years, to secure employment
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram