- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bill Nye beatdown.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:56 am to dragginass
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:56 am to dragginass
If you think that was a beat down of Nye, you are an idiot
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:57 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
ok
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:03 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
If you think that was a beat down of Nye, you are an idiot
You are such an obnoxious clown. I hope you keep posting after the dems lose even more seats next election.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:31 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
If you think that was a beat down of Nye, you are an idiot
It wasn't a beatdown but Nye is clearly not the guy you want proposing the validity of climate change. Dude is so in over his head. Same when he talks about abortion. His knowledge is limited to rudimentary concepts and correlations.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:34 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
Correlation does not imply causation, which is what Nye was dependent on in the exchange. Tucker was asking, since the science is "settled", how large of an impact man has had on climate change. He proceeds to answer with "Grapes in Italy, rabble rabble, grapes in the UK, rabble rabble, 1700s, rabble rabble".
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:34 am to Cruiserhog
Hey now, don't you insult this board's new God. Sure Tucker sounded like an idiot, but to PT he's a goddamn genius
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:43 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
ll Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
He did interrupt him a lot but thats because Nye was trying to ramble while avoiding the only important question.
Its understood that the climate changes and has always fluctuated. But its not known how much its changed from what it ordinarily would ,and to what extent its due to humans. That was Tucker's point that Nye wouldnt address and just blew it off as a dumb question.
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 11:44 am
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:49 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
Nye wasn't answering anything. He was spouting out talking points that are not verifiable.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 12:11 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
ll Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
That is Tucker's schtick and I am sick of it - have been since his second show when it became apparent he was either just shooting fish in a barrel or over shouting anyone who could come close to competing with him.
That said, I made a point to watch the Nye interview because I hoped it would either entertaining or enlightening. Wrong on both counts. Nye was revealed as a lightweight and Tucker kept his schtick of interrupting and laughing. Both looked weak as rainwater and not a single informative neuron connection was made.
But Nye is a goofball - he has nothing but talking points he doesn't really understand and an air of self-appointed but undeserved superiority. In other words, he is a typical DIMprog - worthless
Posted on 3/1/17 at 12:48 pm to Cruiserhog
Nye deserved the beatdown. He went on there and all he did was spout a lot of anecdotal crap and Tucker went after him for specifics.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:08 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
If you think that was a beat down of Nye, you are an idiot
all Tucker did was interrupt the answer Nye was giving because he was too stupid to understand it.
Ummmm... I am actually a scientist unlike Bill Nye, and Carlson clearly beat him down.
He refused to answer the questions and instead deflected and called anyone questioning his interpretation of the data to be a denier and an idiot.
I believe in climate change, and I believe in much of the research. The fact, however, is that many of the researchers are exaggerating the effects humans have had on climate change and that is exactly why we are where we are in this debate.
It reminds me of the shitty arguments on the pay gap where they intentionally use misleading stats to exaggerate their points.
In that example, the argument is that women are paid less across the board, which is not true. The fact is that women, particularly mothers, are losing salary because of the fact we have unpaid maternity leave and when a child is sick, usually the mother is the one taking off work. Those are actual facts.
That women are actually getting paid less than men across the board for the same work is utterly bullshite, but that is why they will continually lose that argument. They are trying to oversell the issue, just like climate change advocates, and most people are tired of being told the end of the world is near.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News