Started By
Message
locked post

Rand Needs to Win the Day- Health Care

Posted on 3/1/17 at 7:58 am
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
7969 posts
Posted on 3/1/17 at 7:58 am
Listening to Rand on the News/ radio his plan appears to be the free-market based plan allowing those in individual plans to form or join associations. The associations then allow for pre-existing conditions as long as you remain in a health plan.

Cassidy- Collins plan seems to be a bridge for the repeal and replacement of obamacare with some entitlement/ stipend but removing mandatory coverages on care that will never be used by 1/2 or most of the population. Also this plan appears to give more power to the states in handling medicare funding. If democrats decide to participate it will likely be a version of the Cassidy Collins plan.

Ryan Plan- I don't think anyone knows particulars but likely addresses items that Trump spoke of in his address to congress with offering national health ins(crossing state lines) and a tax credits. The part that worries me is how Paul's plan will address pre-existing conditions.

It is important that Rand wins with his ideas because if the free-market is not the basis of the plan then prices will artificially remain elevated with government/ entitlements involved.

Also if tax-credits is a necessity to bridge between obamacare repeal and the new replacement I wish it would incorporate the existing child tax "credit" and not giving a new "credit".

ETA:
***TL;DR***

Rand Plan- Free Market Based
Cassidy/ Collins- Obamalite
Ryan Plan- Who knows
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 10:11 am
Posted by pcolatiger28
Pensacola, Fl
Member since Apr 2009
1284 posts
Posted on 3/1/17 at 8:43 am to
What are the odds Trump listens to Rand? I believe he has said good things about Rand before but I dont know if he is taken seriously in this current administration. I'm a big fan of Rand and I think he is s smart guy. I would love him to have more of a say/role in things.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26945 posts
Posted on 3/1/17 at 8:47 am to
If it's going to cover pre-existing conditions, then it needs to not be called insurance.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60694 posts
Posted on 3/1/17 at 9:25 am to
One thing they need to do is address the fact that if Obamacare was so freaking awesome, then why didn't members of Congress enroll in the exchanges?

The combination of crossing state lines with allowing folks to form associations irrespective of their employer is the winner, IMO.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:05 am to
quote:

with eliminating individual plans and allowing those individuals to form or join associations.


That is not exactly what is in his plan. He is not going to eliminate individual plans. He is simply going to encourage associations.

I will tell you this and Paul should listen---groups often times cannot buy health insurance per person cheaper than an individual can.

I support the Paul plan among all the plans out there but I do encourage him to add language that will encourage at least some services to be subscription based. Until we address the pricing model we are not going to actually cut health care cost.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram