- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Watched the OJ 30 for 30: Can anyone possibly believe he didn't do it after that
Posted on 2/23/17 at 12:57 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 2/23/17 at 12:57 pm to finchmeister08
ive been trying to figure out what the biggest frick up was for the prosecution. its between:
a) letting the trial take place where it took place and because of that
b) having the jury that they had
c) marsha clark having her head so far up her arse that she thought she could relate to african american women when it was so clear that she couldnt
d) letting the jury take a walk through OJs house
e) basing their case on the crime scene and not vetting the first officer on the scene who ends up having a recording of him saying some horrible, disgusting, vile shite
f) the glove
i mean what a truly remarkable study in what not to do. they literally lost an unlosable trial
a) letting the trial take place where it took place and because of that
b) having the jury that they had
c) marsha clark having her head so far up her arse that she thought she could relate to african american women when it was so clear that she couldnt
d) letting the jury take a walk through OJs house
e) basing their case on the crime scene and not vetting the first officer on the scene who ends up having a recording of him saying some horrible, disgusting, vile shite
f) the glove
i mean what a truly remarkable study in what not to do. they literally lost an unlosable trial
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 12:59 pm
3
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:19 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
letting the trial take place where it took place and because of that
Where were you going to move it to?
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:25 pm to WestCoastAg
The glove was the only thing I thought the prosecution bombed on.
- Location was a political thing that they just basically felt they had to give in on.
- Jury, well, not much you can do from that location.
- I think they tried to fight the field trip to the house.
- Fuhrman, well, shite happens.
Now, the police guys not wearing gloves to collect evidence and not taking it directly to the lab etc., that was an abomination IMO.
- Location was a political thing that they just basically felt they had to give in on.
- Jury, well, not much you can do from that location.
- I think they tried to fight the field trip to the house.
- Fuhrman, well, shite happens.
Now, the police guys not wearing gloves to collect evidence and not taking it directly to the lab etc., that was an abomination IMO.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:40 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
a) letting the trial take place where it took place and because of that
That was it.
quote:
b) having the jury that they had
Only had the worst of the worst to choose from thanks to A.
quote:
c) marsha clark having her head so far up her arse that she thought she could relate to african american women when it was so clear that she couldnt
Still links more to A
quote:
d) letting the jury take a walk through OJs house
Ito should have been disbarred for that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News