Started By
Message

re: Watched the OJ 30 for 30: Can anyone possibly believe he didn't do it after that

Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:42 am to
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139870 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:42 am to
So the 30 for 30 is the end all be all? That is very dangerous to only take one source. A director/producer can easily manipulate the feeling of a "documentary".
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 10:43 am
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109125 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

So the 30 for 30 is the end all be all? That is very dangerous to only take one source. A director/producer can easily manipulate the feeling of a "documentary".



Yeah. It's incredibly thorough. One of the jurors point blank says that she knows he did it, but they were going to let him off regardless due to Rodney King. The only people in that documentary out of 80 people interviewed who thinks that OJ is still innocent are F Lee Bailey (who is totally full of shite and lying) and one of his childhood friends.

And how Bill Hodgman paints the night of the murders, it's hard to deny that is in all likelihood what happened. There was so much blood and it was so fricking violent that there's no way that there wouldn't be further evidence of another person being on the scene.

Watch this scene. It's about an hour in. Warning, it's highly, highly graphic and NSFW: LINK
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 10:54 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram