Started By
Message
locked post

How many abortions are result of mother's health?

Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:07 pm
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24758 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:07 pm
Are there any concrete figures available detailing the percentage of performed abortions which are due to life risk of mother? This is the most common argument I hear from the "pro choicers" as their gotcha question, and I am curious what the actual number is. It's funny, because it appears to be nothing more than a distraction from the real issue of them wanting to allow moms to be the ability to kill a living being for the purpose of selfish desires; however, they hide behind this "health of mother" issue.

So, what's the percentage both overall and for late term abortions?
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35563 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:09 pm to
Article with citations

eta: It says 1% but the figure says 3% for health of the mother, so idk.



quote:

Are there rare cases when abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother? Yes. As mentioned above, these rare cases occur less than 1% of the time. In fact, even if you lump in all NON life threatening health issues that are cited by mothers as a reason for abortion then the total number only increases to 2.8%. [4]
This post was edited on 2/1/17 at 12:11 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134905 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:10 pm to
I was thinking of this the other day. The left uses mother's health, rape, and fetal deformities as a rally cry but they have to be in the >5% category. The vast majority have got to be "I just don't want a baby" abortions.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55470 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:13 pm to
1:100,000,000
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11291 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:14 pm to
The time that would be to protect the life of the mother would likely be an ectopic pregnancy and that would be terminated prior to 12 weeks. That's a legit reason.

If the embryo implants in the Fallopian tube, then that could rupture as the baby grows and cause the death of both mother and child. The choice is not one of the mother's comfort over the baby's life, the choice is then to save the mother do you sacrifice the child or do you not do anything and risk both lives. It's a different thought process altogether.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29245 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:16 pm to
Irrelevant imo. If you don't agree with abortion don't have one.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:17 pm to
I'm going to guess less than 1%.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34853 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:17 pm to
so small it's basically irrelevant. Liberals love to make a huge mess over something that basically isn't a thing
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112635 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:29 pm to
If the mother's health is dependent on not going through birth then partial-birth abortion is never for the health of the mother because 90% of the baby comes out before the procedure is terminated.

Bill Clinton vetoed a bill by Congress to ban late term abortion because the bill specified the exemption as 'physical health.' He wanted 'psychological health.' IE, the baby coming out alive would make mommy mad therefore injuring her psychological health.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19716 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:52 pm to
about 95% of abortions are for convenience, after the fact birth control
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:54 pm to
Very few.

Abortion for the life of a mother - actual risk is sad but justifiable. I would guess there are many of these that would be the result of a non viable pregnancy (ectopic).

I wish I didn't care about abortion. It would make it easier because I wouldn't have to think about it or argue over it.
I just can't get past the idea that abortion ends a hum life. I don't think I could ever change my mind on that.

Over the weekend I was contacted by a woman who turned out to be my half sister. We have never met and though as a teen I heard rumors I had no idea if they were true or not. The only family members who would have known have passed away (including my biological father).
Her biological mother decided to put her up for adoption because she recognized her inability to adequately care for her.
She ended up with amazing parents who raised her well and she is now a beautiful and accomplished young woman.
Y'all just can't imagine (unless you've experienced similar) how amazing it feels to connect with a sibling you never knew you had. This further enforces my belief that choosing life is always a better option (when at all possible- mothers life excluded,obviously)
This post was edited on 2/1/17 at 1:02 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46572 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 12:55 pm to
Between 2-5%, depending on the source and what they list under "health of the mother".
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 1:00 pm to
It is extremely rare that an abortion is needed to save the life of the mother. If the mother's life is in danger, delivery is almost always the best solution. Then the medical staff can attempt to save the child's life but of course, it may occur that the child cannot survive. This is not a willful act to end the baby's life. This is not abortion.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/1/17 at 1:20 pm to
Not as many as those from mom being a whore

I wonder the percentage done on actual pros
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram