Started By
Message

re: Acting AG tells DOJ not to defend Trump order

Posted on 1/30/17 at 5:54 pm to
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65974 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 5:54 pm to

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.


What is his position in the administration?
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted


Well that settles that........

IF this is true, this person should be directed by official government correspondence that the president expects the DOJ to immediately implement and defend asn necessary any and all presidential orders. The minute she fails to do so, she should be demoted or potentially fired.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76567 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:01 pm to
quote:


Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.

Weird that it didn't ban people from all those other Muslim countries then. Would've been a lot more effective. That's like a billion Muslims that can still come here.
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
4482 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend


What religion?
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63225 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.



I've seen this posted multiple times today, in the context of challenges to the EO. How is this relevant? The EO does not call our specifc religions, and Rudy is not in the administration. It doesn't matter what Trump may or may not have asked him. Why not argue the constitutionality of the EO based on the actual EO?
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14448 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.



I could've sworn that he said on Judge Jeanine's show that it was not religious in nature but security threat based. There isn't a religion named in the EO.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.


You are a liar.

I heard what he said and that was not it.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:48 pm to
quote:


Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.


Rudy is a private citizen and his opinion has no influence on actual policy.

That's the weakest citation for a defense you could have found.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram