- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYT shits all over Buzzfeed & Pissgate media
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:55 am
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:55 am
LINK
Some highlights (emphasis added):
Interesting times, indeed...
Some highlights (emphasis added):
quote:
But CNN declined to include the specific allegations contained in the dossier — such as collusion between Mr. Trump’s team and Russian operatives — saying that its journalists could not independently verify them
quote:
BuzzFeed’s decision, besides its immediate political ramifications for a president-elect who is to be inaugurated in 10 days, was sure to accelerate a roiling debate about the role and credibility of the traditional media in today’s frenetic, polarized information age.
Of particular interest was the use of unsubstantiated information from anonymous sources, a practice that fueled some of the so-called fake news — false rumors passed off as legitimate journalism — that proliferated during the presidential election.
quote:
In a brief interview in the Times newsroom on Tuesday evening, Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, said the paper would not publish the document because the allegations were “totally unsubstantiated.”
quote:
Immediately after BuzzFeed’s publication, some reporters volunteered that they, too, had received copies of the report. “Raise your hand if you too were approached with this story,” Julia Ioffe, a journalist who has written extensively on Russia, wrote on Twitter, adding that she had not reported on the information in the document “because it was impossible to verify.”
Writers at the blog Lawfare, which covers national security issues, said they had been in possession of the document “for a couple of weeks” but opted not to publish because the allegations were unproven.
“Yes, they are explosive; they are also entirely unsubstantiated, at least to our knowledge, at this stage,” the site wrote on Tuesday night. “For this reason, even now, we are not going to discuss the specific allegations within the document.”
Interesting times, indeed...
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:56 am to udtiger
Wikileaks = uncredible
Buzzfeed = fact
/CNN logic
Buzzfeed = fact
/CNN logic
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:56 am to udtiger
quote:
Interesting times, indeed
When you consider the NYT as the voice of reason
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:56 am to udtiger
It's so far out there that only a place like Buzzfeed and a joke like CNN would tie themselves to it.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:57 am to udtiger
It's good that the NYT is at least trying to keep some of their journalistic integrity in tact.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:57 am to udtiger
Is the MSM trying to carve a niche in itself to convince people that some of the MSM is honest?
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:58 am to udtiger
quote:
CNN
quote:
its journalists
Does not compute.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:00 am to udtiger
Hmmmm.. So the NYT, a fake news outlet are claiming other news to be fake. By Trumpkin logic wouldnt that make #pissgate totally legit?
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:01 am to udtiger
So now we have a clear picture. Our CIA is on the same level as BuzzFeed. I can just imagine president trump sitting in the oval office, and in bursts the director of the CIA." Mr. Trump, Mr. Trump, we just found out a grandma has discovered a way to remove Isis using this one weird trick! "
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:04 am to udtiger
Tapper and the gang on CNN just said the reporting of the unverified details was irresponsible. I agree. Reporting that Trump was briefed about a report that the Russians have compromising information on him is absolutely inbounds, however.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:05 am to udtiger
I read this just as the New York Times. It is a report, but more importantly it is only alleged to be a credible report. I don't assume credibility. This one doesn't get a pass on that. Of course it would be good for my tribe if it is true, but it seems suspect.
Not as suspect as pizzagate, but suspect nonetheless.
Not as suspect as pizzagate, but suspect nonetheless.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:36 am to udtiger
CNN has repeated that the info in the buzzfeed docs is completely unverified. Their story isn't that they claim it's true but that Russians claim to have dirt on Trump and that the IC has taken those threats seriously.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:40 am to udtiger
quote:
Pinned Tweet
Peter Thiel ?@Thiel3X 4h4 hours ago
#BuzzFeed, you saw what I did to Gawker. You are next.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:42 am to udtiger
This is a perfect time to re introduce real news reporting. Gain the credibility as THE source. Do so by exposing the why behind all the bullshite reporting. America would flock to it. Could be the saving grace for some of the old newspapers
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:04 am to udtiger
The mainstream isn't even pretending to follow any process. Taibbi noted about the WaPo Rusdia story that shortly followed the election that it was unparalleled how the media was ditching its processes and standards.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:09 am to udtiger
Isn't buzzfeed a shitty click bait site?
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:11 am to udtiger
Also, of course that failure John McCain would have his gimp fingerprints all over this.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News