- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Danny Etling vs Louisville (every pass and run)
Posted on 1/6/17 at 8:02 am to Bojangles
Posted on 1/6/17 at 8:02 am to Bojangles
quote:
You are really invested in trying to convince this board how DE isn't the answer at qb.
It's odd.
Seems like it's personal with you
Why can't I simply have an opinion? As I fan, I am entitled to an opinion on how I'd like to see the offense function. Just as some people are very pleased with where we are, why can't I simply view it differently without it being personal? There are just as man posters here, that go out of their way to bolster the idea that we merely need "competent" play. What's personal about believing that we need better than that? It's football. A discussion board. There nothing "odd" about looking at the video posted, and seeing what I see.
This post was edited on 1/6/17 at 8:04 am
Posted on 1/6/17 at 8:10 am to prepsportsallday
quote:
There are just as man posters here, that go out of their way to bolster the idea that we merely need "competent" play. What's personal about believing that we need better than that? It's football
I'm with you on that. Florida ST would have been merely a good team instead of a NC without Winston. Same with Clemson with DeSean Watson. While you can win big with merely a pretty good QB, a really good to great one would make it a whole lot more likely. Hopefully we get that with either Narcisse or Brennon. At least they seem to have more potential coming in than what we have had lately (other than maybe Harris)
Posted on 1/6/17 at 8:14 am to prepsportsallday
You are basing that premise on:
A) an undersized qb that has never taken a meaningful college football snap
B) players that have already been passed up on depth chart
That's why it seems personal.
Etling isn't a 5 star recruit that's gonna make millions in the NFL.
We don't have one of those on the roster currently.
Luckily for LSU that's not what we need.
If Etling makes the improvements that WE ALL expect ALL players to make from their 1st year starting to their 2nd year, then there's Absolutley no reason why his performance and production won't be more than enough to give this team every chance to win every game next year.
You can't argue with that.
If you do, that's why it appears like its personal or you have some sort of agenda driven narrative.
That's as plain as I can put it to you.
A) an undersized qb that has never taken a meaningful college football snap
B) players that have already been passed up on depth chart
That's why it seems personal.
Etling isn't a 5 star recruit that's gonna make millions in the NFL.
We don't have one of those on the roster currently.
Luckily for LSU that's not what we need.
If Etling makes the improvements that WE ALL expect ALL players to make from their 1st year starting to their 2nd year, then there's Absolutley no reason why his performance and production won't be more than enough to give this team every chance to win every game next year.
You can't argue with that.
If you do, that's why it appears like its personal or you have some sort of agenda driven narrative.
That's as plain as I can put it to you.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News