- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
37 year old man who hit on 16 year old at Starbucks banned
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:15 pm
LINK
Since when?!
quote:
Spokane police defended the decision to ban Werner, claiming businesses have a right to refuse service for any reason.
Since when?!
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:17 pm to Revelator
So you think it should be okay for grown men to hit 15yo kids?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:18 pm to Revelator
quote:
Spokane police defended the decision to ban Werner, claiming businesses have a right to refuse service for any reason.
Unless you're a couple of queens who want to get hitched. Then you can't be refused service for any reason.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:30 pm to Revelator
LOL at thinking the spokane police are liberal.
And I believe its long held legal principle that businesses can ban individuals for reasons, assuming they aren't related to civil rights.
And I believe its long held legal principle that businesses can ban individuals for reasons, assuming they aren't related to civil rights.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:33 pm to Revelator
oh look Revelator with a 'us Christians are persecuted because we cant discriminate' post
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:48 pm to Revelator
Age of consent is 16 in Washington, so legally he did nothing wrong if all he did was flirt with her or ask her out.
Now that being said Starbucks is a private corporation who should be allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Yes, that includes refusing service for being gay, black, female, etc. Public accommodation laws have outlived their usefulness.
Now that being said Starbucks is a private corporation who should be allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Yes, that includes refusing service for being gay, black, female, etc. Public accommodation laws have outlived their usefulness.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:53 pm to Revelator
quote:
KREM reports Werner also referenced his website dedicated to “age gap love” when defending himself.
Werner does, in fact, have an entire website dedicated to why men should date young women (specifically those born in the 1990s).
Werner, who calls himself a “scientist without a degree in science,” defends his preference for younger women by saying having children with men over 35 will give the children “stronger DNA.”
Throughout his Facebook pages, Werner accuses people who don't accept his “age gap love” theory of being “hateful” and “ageist and against truth like Republicans.”
Yea, let's hold a rally for this guy.
The dude is obviously a creeper and I seriously doubt his side of the story where he acts completely innocent of being a pervy frick that was weirding out the staff.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:59 pm to Revelator
Not shocked by the the regulars responses.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 6:11 pm to Revelator
quote:
Throughout his Facebook pages, Werner accuses people who don't accept his “age gap love” theory of being “hateful” and “ageist and against truth like Republicans.”
Calling people who disagree with them hateful while labeling them an -ist in the same breath. Making what gets you off your core identity and the most sacred unassailable thing in life. I wonder what type of progressive ideolgy fosters this kind of thinking. Could it be the ugly rhetoric from the right or perhaps climate change?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:12 pm to Revelator
quote:
37 year old man who hit on 16 year old at Starbucks banned
A lot of girls that age look much older.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:20 pm to Revelator
Some 16 year old females look 23.
Has anyone asked Zach about this?
Has anyone asked Zach about this?
This post was edited on 1/3/17 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:54 pm to Revelator
This is the guy, I wouldn't want him around my business either. Also says he is homeless.
Posted on 1/4/17 at 2:57 am to Revelator
Can he not just claim he is a transgender lesbian and he was asking her how she would like Starbucks to decorate their engagement muffin? Seems like that would tick enough boxes.
Posted on 1/4/17 at 6:15 am to Revelator
quote:
Since when?!
Unless the "offended" is gay then all hell breaks loose
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:15 pm to Revelator
Pick your battles.
Guy is a creep, gets called out for being a creep, actively promotes being a creep.
Businesses are allowed to protect their employees.
This does not equate to a bakery that bakes wedding cakes refusing service to people for being gay. Or a restaurant that refuses to serve people based on skin color.
Guy is a creep, gets called out for being a creep, actively promotes being a creep.
Businesses are allowed to protect their employees.
This does not equate to a bakery that bakes wedding cakes refusing service to people for being gay. Or a restaurant that refuses to serve people based on skin color.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:21 pm to Revelator
Any business should be able to discriminate for any reason.
That should be applied evenly, no matter how arbitrary the reason.
If that isn't the case 100% of the time, I oppose instances such as this.
That should be applied evenly, no matter how arbitrary the reason.
If that isn't the case 100% of the time, I oppose instances such as this.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:53 pm to Revelator
quote:
Spokane police defended the decision to ban Werner, claiming businesses have a right to refuse service for any reason.
Since when?!
You used to see signs posted to that effect openly at businesses. WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE.
That was tacitly racist and was made illegal 50 years ago.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News