Started By
Message

re: If Hillary wins the popular vote...

Posted on 11/9/16 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 3:37 pm to
Winning the popular vote is meaningless. Few Presidents in recent history have done that.
Get over it.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Winning the popular vote is meaningless. Few Presidents in recent history have done that. Get over it.


I just checked. In the 1932 election with the country in the depth of the Great Depression, FDR only got 57% of the vote. That was the most ever.

Winning by razor thin margins is pretty much the norm.

1992 - Bill Clinton won the election to serve as the 42nd President of the United States by a wide margin in the Electoral College, receiving 43% of the popular vote against Bush's 37.5% percent and Perot's 18.9%. It was the first time since 1968 that a candidate won the White House with under 50% of the popular vote. Only Washington, D.C. and Clinton's home state of Arkansas gave the majority of their votes to a single candidate in the entire country; the rest were won by pluralities of the vote. - wiki

In 1860 Lincoln handily won in the EC but garnered only 40% of the popular vote.
This post was edited on 11/9/16 at 3:47 pm
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8856 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Winning the popular vote is meaningless. Few Presidents in recent history have done that.


huh?? Only two presidents didn't win the popular vote in the last 128 years, that is W Bush and Trump.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram