- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Start an Investigation
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:48 am
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:48 am
If, as so many believe, the governing body of the SEC is manipulating the officiating to affect the outcome on games then why not investigate? Is this crime, seems as though it would be against the law?
I have seen some really bad officiating. The Bama player stood over an Aggie yesterday and clearly should have been called for it. We need answers
I have seen some really bad officiating. The Bama player stood over an Aggie yesterday and clearly should have been called for it. We need answers
7
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to 75503Tiger
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to 75503Tiger
Agree, but not gonna happen too much Homer power for them n too much Homer bias perceived for us.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:51 am to 75503Tiger
LOL
Every professional entity is legally protected from being "investigated" or "sued" due to the fact that you, as a fan, are consuming legally defined "entertainment".
Give it up.
Either quit watching Bama games (which is what I do, unless they are playing LSU) or take it for what it is.
If watching them get away with murder doesn't entertain you, don't watch. It is simple, really.
Every professional entity is legally protected from being "investigated" or "sued" due to the fact that you, as a fan, are consuming legally defined "entertainment".
Give it up.
Either quit watching Bama games (which is what I do, unless they are playing LSU) or take it for what it is.
If watching them get away with murder doesn't entertain you, don't watch. It is simple, really.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:51 am to 75503Tiger
Refs are not impartial and never will be.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:53 am to Dave lsu 89
Someone from the outside will have to be presented enough hard facts to get them interested. Otherwise, almost every ref in the conference is simply a moron so we need to review the hiring process
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
One player wore red and the other maroon...It is all corrupt. Too much money involved for it not to be. TV ratings will be a big factor in picking the playoff teams.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Topwater Trout
Watched the game in HD.... calls seemed fair for most of the game to me.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
The difference was explained.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:56 am to EZE Tiger Fan
So SEC football and the WWF are equivalent. Rasslin and football can be faked
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:56 am to 75503Tiger
I tell you it's pretty scary this personal foul rule. You saw how Ole Miss was playing dirty and not getting called, but our guys get called on the reaction. BAMA will do that much worse to try and get our players ejected. They know the calls will go their way. Our guys must play extremely disciplined. Aranda needs to teach these guys to react with words and not physically. Tell them to smile and talk about their Mama at the same time!
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:00 am to tiger chaser
What about the DB who stretched the jersey of the receiver but he caught it anyway? Or the lineman who went helmet first a half step too late on the tackle.
I'm not just talking gumps. Every game this board lights up with cries of bad calls.
I'm not just talking gumps. Every game this board lights up with cries of bad calls.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:05 am to 75503Tiger
If it is a conspiracy then conversation haven taken place, orders have been given. Those refs aren't as clueless as they appear.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:14 am to 75503Tiger
Lost in the victory last night was the horrible officiating, including two "reviews" by Bugeyes that took about as long as it took the lead ref to run to the sideline and back, meaning ithey didn't even get looked at. Prepare thy anus for when they have to protect the SEC's hope for the playoffs. You haven't seen one-sided yet.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:14 am to 75503Tiger
We need wikileaks to hack the SEC and the Bama emails to see if there is some evidence of collusion. 
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:17 am to Tiger Nation 84
jThere was no difference between the blatant non call against Bama and then the ejection of the Aggie player . Then the league tells CBS according to Danielson that the Bama hit on the Aggie player, " The aggie player wasn't defenseless. " Hell why even have the targeting call if that's the answer. yet when LSU plays Mizzou , we have no flags yet Ritter and his crew over in B'ham stops play and reviews to tall targeting against us on the punt. That is absolutely a crock of manure.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:24 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
That seriously was as blatant as you will ever see. Unbelievable.. But I guess when it comes to Bama, not so much. This has been going on with them for a really long time.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:33 am to Mike da Tigah
So the aTm guy takes action to show the gumps that blood is met with blood but the refs made sure that got shut down
If a team is going to bring it they had best expect to get it back, if the opposition has a sack they will respond in kind
If a team is going to bring it they had best expect to get it back, if the opposition has a sack they will respond in kind
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 9:35 am
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:34 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
What was the difference?
One was a defenseless player. One was not.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:36 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
Start an Investigation
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
One was a kick returner that was running up the field. He wasn't in the process of being tackled and was scanning the field. The other was a running back engaged with the guy who intercepted the ball about to make the tackle. The guy also had his hand in Harris' face where he couldn't see anything. Then another player lunches himself into Harris who can see nothing and is the definition of defenseless. Hope this helps you in your quest for the almighty conspiracy.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News