- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Start an Investigation
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:03 pm to 1loyalbamafan
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:03 pm to 1loyalbamafan
quote:No, dumb frick. If the announcers said that was the official reason, then it would seem logical that they got that info directly from the officiating crew or the SEC office. It's reasonable to assume that official lines of communication are established for these types of things when running multimillion dollar productions.
So they are the authority on officiating? Or just when you agree because it's for or against the team you hate?
0
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:13 pm to Katy Tiger
quote:
Its not like there isn't a precedence for refs being prosecuted by the feds for cheating - and those were NBA refs. They were using their positions to manipulate the final score of games to affect the point spread. This is not conspiracy theory - but fact. Do you honestly think based on what we see every week that the SEC refs are not affecting the outcome of games? If you think that, you're either a Gump or know nothing about football.
You understand my point, it does seem as though the games are not being called equally. Seems the refs have a knack for inserting themselves and affecting outcomes and that is illegal if it is systemic.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:28 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
One was a ball carrier and one was not
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:51 pm to 75503Tiger
Glory be though! Bama did get called for one holding call!! Hell, that in and of itself, makes it a good day of officiating.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:54 pm to Lsuchs
quote:
One was a ball carrier and one was not
So you're saying targeting cannot be called when it is a ball carrier being hit?
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:56 pm to PacLSU
I've never seen a ball carrier called "defenseless" or "targeted" outside of a WR the second after he catches the ball.
Remember when the 12th man knocked out UT returner (fumble) w helmet to helmet? Same no call
I'm not disagreeing w Bama bias. Just saying ball carriers never get the helmet to helmet call. How many RBs have you ever seen get helmet to helmet? They get hit in the helmet more than any player
Remember when the 12th man knocked out UT returner (fumble) w helmet to helmet? Same no call
I'm not disagreeing w Bama bias. Just saying ball carriers never get the helmet to helmet call. How many RBs have you ever seen get helmet to helmet? They get hit in the helmet more than any player
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:58 pm to Dave lsu 89
quote:
not gonna happen too much Homer power for them
Bama walks on water- they are protected almost as much as Hillary is from the media...
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News