- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Carson Palmer a Hall-of-Famer?
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:18 pm to sorantable
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:18 pm to sorantable
Fwiw, Palmer has been a better QB throughout his career than Eli Manning, but neither deserve to get in the HOF.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:27 pm to slackster
I guess that really would settle the debate over how much championships matter. Seems dumb, to be such a true team sport.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:41 pm to sorantable
Yeah I mean if Eli gets in, you open the floodgates to lesser players everywhere. No one would consider Palmer even close, yet plenty of people argue for Eli to get in.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:51 pm to slackster
I think Eli gets in because of the Joe Namath rule.
Voters seem to put inordinate amount of worth in this undefinable "clutch moements" based on team achievements but given to the QB because "he's the general" in the antiquated world of Pro Football lexicon and thinking among voters.
Maybe Johnny Unitas was the general on the field...but those days are long gone. Nobody is a general on the field these days with specialization...even Joe Montana wasn't - Walsh called everyting...and control like Belichick and all organizations. QBs can audible but they ain't calling shite on their own without massive input from the sidelines and upstairs. Even Manning, he got 2-3 plays in his helmet...and audibled to what looked best to him at the line. But he wasn't devising any goddamn gameplan like they said Montana did...that was Walsh...coaches get paid for a reason...you don't just acquiesce your role.
That really hasn't happened for 40 years in the NFL - despite idiot announcers saying, "he's a coach on the field." B.S. He's a QB on the field, that's his job, make the throws. He has a few options to change things...but nobody is designing the offense down the field like Johnny Unitas.
Eli has had disastrous years. But yet he gets talked about HOF...Palmer has a bunch of good and never bad years...and even looked good on the damn Raiders when the Raiders sucked arse.
But HOF will never look at QBs in isolation...like Heisman, it's always team achievement, media-love and moments to remember that we can watch on the good old NFL Films. Joe Namath endorses Eli in but Palmer out. (And Palmer shouldn't be in...that tells you something how much the SB might carry Eli...scary...he was quite crap for many seasons.)
Voters seem to put inordinate amount of worth in this undefinable "clutch moements" based on team achievements but given to the QB because "he's the general" in the antiquated world of Pro Football lexicon and thinking among voters.
Maybe Johnny Unitas was the general on the field...but those days are long gone. Nobody is a general on the field these days with specialization...even Joe Montana wasn't - Walsh called everyting...and control like Belichick and all organizations. QBs can audible but they ain't calling shite on their own without massive input from the sidelines and upstairs. Even Manning, he got 2-3 plays in his helmet...and audibled to what looked best to him at the line. But he wasn't devising any goddamn gameplan like they said Montana did...that was Walsh...coaches get paid for a reason...you don't just acquiesce your role.
That really hasn't happened for 40 years in the NFL - despite idiot announcers saying, "he's a coach on the field." B.S. He's a QB on the field, that's his job, make the throws. He has a few options to change things...but nobody is designing the offense down the field like Johnny Unitas.
Eli has had disastrous years. But yet he gets talked about HOF...Palmer has a bunch of good and never bad years...and even looked good on the damn Raiders when the Raiders sucked arse.
But HOF will never look at QBs in isolation...like Heisman, it's always team achievement, media-love and moments to remember that we can watch on the good old NFL Films. Joe Namath endorses Eli in but Palmer out. (And Palmer shouldn't be in...that tells you something how much the SB might carry Eli...scary...he was quite crap for many seasons.)
This post was edited on 10/2/16 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:08 pm to 3HourTour
quote:
Probably not. But he's been a very solid QB for over a decade.
If you compare Carson Palmer's numbers to Troy Aikman's adjusted for era, they're very similar.
Y/A+ - Yards per attempt
Aikman- 104
Palmer- 107
Advantage- Palmer
NY/A+ -- Net yards per attempt
Aikman- 108
Palmer- 109
Very slight advantage- Palmer
AY/A+ -- Adjusted yards per attempt
Aikman- 104
Palmer- 105
Very slight advantage- Palmer
ANY/A+ -- Adjusted net yards per attempt
Aikman- 106
Palmer- 106
Push
Cmp%+ -- Completion percentage index
Aikman- 114
Palmer- 106
Advantage- Aikman
TD%+ - Passing TD percentage
Aikman- 95
Palmer- 106
Advantage- Palmer
Int%+ -- Interception percentage
Aikman- 106
Palmer- 97
Advantage- Aikman
Rate+ -- Passer rating
Aikman- 106
Palmer- 105
Slight Advantage- Aikman
Aikman was a much more accurate passer who was better at taking care of the ball while Palmer was far more prolific at throwing TD passes but all of their other numbers are virtually identical. So if Aikman's in the HOF, who's to say Palmer shouldn't be in as well?
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:13 pm to Bench McElroy
Two very different visions continue to contend when it comes to Halls of Fame.
Is it a gatekeeping exercise to define the greatest of all time, or an achievement through productivity available to any who enjoy long term, sustained, and successful play?
Palmer is a good litmus test for which side of that divide a person falls on-- perhaps only surpassed by Eli Manning.
Is it a gatekeeping exercise to define the greatest of all time, or an achievement through productivity available to any who enjoy long term, sustained, and successful play?
Palmer is a good litmus test for which side of that divide a person falls on-- perhaps only surpassed by Eli Manning.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:14 pm to sorantable
Has anyone ever watched Carson Palmer and thought "I'm watching a future Hall of Famer?"
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:21 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:Mrs Ryan Fitzpatrick
Has anyone ever watched Carson Palmer and thought "I'm watching a future Hall of Famer?"
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:24 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Has anyone ever watched Carson Palmer and thought "I'm watching a future Hall of Famer?"
Apart from a few big throws in the SB...has anyone thought Eli was?
He's helmet catch throw was a college toss-up throw.
But granted his throw from his goal line, against Pats 2.0 - was money as hell to the sideline.
I think people love Eli because he destroys Boston fans. Who have became annoying with the emergence of the Sox and Pats at the same time. The sports world became New England for the last 10 years. That's all media cared about. Pats/Sox...
This post was edited on 10/2/16 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:24 pm to BoardReader
quote:He'll get in, but shouldn't.
Eli Manning
Posted on 10/2/16 at 7:24 pm to slackster
Palmer is 37, has one post season win.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 8:45 pm to sorantable
OP, please tell us you're joking.
Posted on 10/2/16 at 9:01 pm to dukke v
He has a super bowl and 20,000 more passing yards.
So even in an age of inflated passing numbers his numbers are HOF worthy
So even in an age of inflated passing numbers his numbers are HOF worthy
Posted on 10/2/16 at 9:33 pm to sorantable
Carson Palmer is a lot like Tony Romo in my opinion. They have both been pretty good QBs but are often injured and would probably need a SB Run to be considered for the HOF.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News