- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why keep 3 QB's?
Posted on 9/5/16 at 12:47 pm to LSUlefty
Posted on 9/5/16 at 12:47 pm to LSUlefty
Taking away roster spots from other guys that will be inactive.
Yes we need at least one more lineman, but no one we had will be better than any of the QBs or HBs we kept so why keep them just to keep them?
We also had 5 DTs and 5 DEs. We cut a DT to possibly make room for another lineman.
So are you saying you would prefer an inactive Mabry over an inactive Grayson?
Because in the end both are still inactive. It REALLY does not matter unless it cost us someone better (which it did not this year). How many games do you think Mabry would have been active for?
Yes we need at least one more lineman, but no one we had will be better than any of the QBs or HBs we kept so why keep them just to keep them?
We also had 5 DTs and 5 DEs. We cut a DT to possibly make room for another lineman.
So are you saying you would prefer an inactive Mabry over an inactive Grayson?
Because in the end both are still inactive. It REALLY does not matter unless it cost us someone better (which it did not this year). How many games do you think Mabry would have been active for?
This post was edited on 9/5/16 at 12:49 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News