- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU not ranked by ESPN as one of 8 "Blue-Blood" CFB Programs
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:07 pm to PhillyFan1994
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:07 pm to PhillyFan1994
True meaning of Blue Bloods would be schools like.
Navy
Army
ND
Mich
Rutgers
Penn
Princeston
Yale
Harvard
If you want to say the best since 1950 then OK. But the true meaning of Blue Bloods in College Football are the originals.
Navy
Army
ND
Mich
Rutgers
Penn
Princeston
Yale
Harvard
If you want to say the best since 1950 then OK. But the true meaning of Blue Bloods in College Football are the originals.
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:21 pm to DeafVallyBatnR
quote:
True meaning of Blue Bloods would be schools like. Navy Army ND Mich Rutgers Penn Princeston Yale Harvard If you want to say the best since 1950 then OK. But the true meaning of Blue Bloods in College Football are the originals
NOT REALLY...
"Blue blood" is more about nobility/royalty... And less about being the "original"
Posted on 8/26/16 at 8:20 am to DeafVallyBatnR
quote:
True meaning of Blue Bloods would be schools like.
Navy
Army
ND
Mich
Rutgers
Penn
Princeston
Yale
Harvard
If you want to say the best since 1950 then OK. But the true meaning of Blue Bloods in College Football are the originals.
Goin' back as far as you are, you'd have several more of the 8 ESPN bluebloods still on that list. USC and Bama were both prominent from the 20's thru the 40's, each playing in numerous Rose Bowls. Ohio State was prominent in the 30's and 40's...and Oklahoma started their rise to power in the 40's. While Texas emerged in the 40's they didn't start to truly hit their stride till the late 50's and into the 60's. Of ESPN's list of 8, I'd say only Nebraska, and possibly Texas, weren't very prominent before 1950...and for Nebraska, you could say before 1960. I'll add the caveat thought that during the 3 year stint of Notre Dame's famed 4 Horsemen, they only lost 2 games...and both of 'em were to Nebraska...
As for Army and Navy, they were only truly prominent in the war years, and a year here or there during the postwar years. And talking pre-1950 football, Minnesota should be included as they were one of the most dominant teams throughout the 30's and early 40's...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News