Started By
Message

re: Question about buying a 2011 Tahoe

Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:16 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84304 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I've had a few things go out wayyyy too early (changing a daytime running lamp is a BITCH).


In-laws just bought a certified 2013 Yukon XL Denali with 42k miles a couple months ago. It just spent 4 days at the dealer due to half the electronics just stopping working. They're good looking vehicles, but I'd shy away from them just based off that and stuff I've read from you and others. Also, a friend of theirs 2012 Yukon XL apparently caught on fire due to some faulty electronics. That kind of stuff is scary considering they have them to move small children.

The Expedition is lacking in features comparatively, but you don't see as many of those kinds of stories (but they also sell way less of them, so have to take that with a grain of salt).
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

The Expedition is lacking in features comparatively, but you don't see as many of those kinds of stories


Before we bought this, we toyed with the idea of buying an older SUV for a few years and then getting something new. Shopping used really showed me how much SUV's kept their value.

But driving Expeditions and Tahoes, I felt like the Tahoes held up much better than the Fords. Now this isn't saying anything for models since 2011. This was more like 2005ish year models being test driven 6 or 7 years later. I will have to say that a King Ranch expedition has an amazing interior.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram