re: Joe Lunardi Bracketology 2/11/16

quote:

---

1) you are arguing that a 118th ranked non conference schedule is not terrible?

---

There are 351 teams in Division 1 basketball. So we were in the upper 1/3...not terrible

quote:

---

angrily; must be near feeding time

---

Oh, I'm dealing with a child, my bad

quote:

---

3) you were the person bringing up point spreads of losses in regulation.

---

Yes, in which we were missing 25 points of scoring on average per game. I'm not sure what is hard to comprehend about that, but you're struggling mightily.

quote:

---

No one on this site is on the committee. You don't have to convince us. You can look at how the committee looks at injuries and close losses in terms of both positives and negatives. I'm not sure who you are trying to convince.

---

Again, what are you saying? I'm arguing a specific argument...that the committee will take into account injuries. Never...not once, has any one said it doesn't matter we lost those 4 games. But you said from the get go injuries didn't matter...then said it does kind of matter but we still lost...then said Vandy was missing a player when we beat them so obviously it matters. I'm not trying to convince anyone, I'm using statements from the biggest and best basketball analysts in the country to prove i'm right (which I'm doing), only to have others (like yourself) say I'm wrong because...well, you just think so.

quote:

---

4) I AGREE BUT I'M MAD TOO!!! Rabble rabble rabble

---

Again, like Chopique said...it's hard to have decent arguments around here because people are childish