Started By
Message

2,897 yards 18TD 10INT- Would you take it?

Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94674 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:01 pm
The first 4 games of 2015, Harris was a total non-factor in the game plan. He averaged 15 passes per game over that span. A competent QB should at a minimum complete 15 passes a game!

Following that 4 game stretch, there was more pass attempts as he averaged 27 passes per game. Extrapolating his average over those 8 games to a full 13 game season would be 2,897 yards 18TDs and 10INTs. These of course are averages so you could give or take on the final stats. Clearly, he wasn't without his flaws through that stretch. His completion percentage was just over 53% which isn't good enough. Getting to near 60% should be the goal as that would have been a SEC top 5 CMP% in 2015. Harris has work to do individually (such as completing intermediate throws) and the coaches have work to do in developing an offense that no longer lends itself to predictability. They flat out have to design better plays and situational playcalling.

I guess looking at those numbers, I'm very cautiously optimistic on Harris taking a step forward. 223 passing yards per game over that stretch somewhat gives me hope that the passing game wasn't totally lifeless but rather youthfully inconsistent at times.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
56103 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:04 pm to
as long as we have the all-star stable of running backs that we currently have, I don't think we will see much more than a minimal passing game. we would be bad to the bone if we could at least get a short range passing game going, though...
Posted by AcetylCoA
Pasadena, California
Member since Nov 2009
2654 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:04 pm to
No. I don't think that stat line would win us a championship.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94674 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

as long as we have the all-star stable of running backs that we currently have, I don't think we will see much more than a minimal passing game


Which is all the more frustrating. You've got bad arse running backs and we consistently compliment them with.....?


quote:

we would be bad to the bone if we could at least get a short range passing game going, though...


Exactly. Beyond whatever limitations we may have had with QBs, I'm not convinced the coaches with their playcalls are doing everything they can to get successful results from the QB position. Our best hope to improve is eliminating the predictability that has plagued Miles' offenses.


ETA: I realize my timing couldn't have ben worse for discussion. Off to the superbowl thread
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 5:18 pm
Posted by mrbayoublu
Acadiana
Member since Jan 2004
2786 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

as long as we have the all-star stable of running backs that we currently have, I don't think we will see much more than a minimal passing game.


This will result in loses to the best teams in the country, and some of the lesser ones. How many years of a "minimal passing game" does it take to learn that this will not get a team to the playoffs?

Actually, a team can do both, have a kick arse running game and a dynamic passing game. It takes both just to get to the college football playoffs.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10095 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Actually, a team can do both, have a kick arse running game and a dynamic passing game. It takes both just to get to the college football playoffs.
2013 agrees.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22422 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:28 pm to
If Harris can just consistantly move the chains this year we will be ok
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 5:29 pm
Posted by Russell2Bowe
Memphis
Member since Jan 2010
1054 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:34 pm to
I think his injury played a big role in the interceptions he threw. I'd venture to say that a healthy BH would have a higher completion % and take care of the ball better (because his accuracy would be much improved).
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14893 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:35 pm to
what's more important that the stat line is situational stats. long pass interceptions on 3rd and long or at the end of the first half don't matter like regular down and distance interceptions. Interceptions against directional schools don't matter like they do in tight games against top SEC West teams.

That stat line is fine if the good parts come against the best 5 teams on the schedule and the bad parts come against the worst 5 teams on the schedule.
Posted by arn
Member since Nov 2015
562 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:45 pm to
That TD/Int ratio is shite. I've seen worse but it is shite
Posted by marcnbc
Bossier City, LA
Member since May 2004
4178 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

No. I don't think that stat line would win us a championship.


2407 yards, 21 td's and 11 int's 56% completion rate won us a title in '07...of course we lost two regular season games that year.
Posted by learnthehardway
B.R./Northshore
Member since Oct 2007
10023 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

think his injury played a big role in the interceptions he threw. I'd venture to say that a healthy BH would have a higher completion % and take care of the ball better (because his accuracy would be much improved).



I agree with this. I also expect to see a more comfortable BH this year which will also improve your numbers. I see a mid to upper level sec qb in BH this coming season. That should be enough if we see some minor improvement in a few other areas. There is reason for optimism for sure.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 6:33 pm to
Yes. If our completion % was 60 or better.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

No. I don't think that stat line would win us a championship. 

What?

So the 4th most single season passing yards in lsu history and a tie for 7th most passing tds in lsh history isnt enough for us to win a title?
I swear some posters on here have no clue about lsu football history
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 6:37 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

That TD/Int ratio is shite. I've seen worse but it is shite


No its not. While its not great 18tds -10 tds isnt horrible. Only 4 qbs in lsu history have thrown more than 18 tds in a season.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 6:41 pm
Posted by AcetylCoA
Pasadena, California
Member since Nov 2009
2654 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

So the 4th most single season passing yards in lsu history and a tie for 7th most passing tds in lsh history isnt enough for us to win a title?
I swear some posters on here have no clue about lsu football history

LSU has 2 championships in the modern era and I would bet that we had more than 18 passing touchdowns both times.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 7:25 pm to
except the a&m game. we would have done better w/o a qb.
Posted by Jmorr0011
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
258 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 7:26 pm to
Mauck threw 28 TD in 2003.
Flynn threw 21 TD in 2007.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 7:28 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46626 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

LSU has 2 championships in the modern era and I would bet that we had more than 18 passing touchdowns both times.


Youre only counting titles that lsu players and coaches have no control over whether or not they even play in the game? Why would you use titles where you are voted into the game over titles that you win your way into?
Posted by dbbuilder79
Overton NV
Member since Dec 2010
4153 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:54 am to

So the 4th most single season passing yards in lsu history and a tie for 7th most passing tds in lsh history isnt enough for us to win a title?



2013 was one of the greatest offensive outings for the tigers and it was just good enough to finish in the top 25 for total offense for that season.

I see what you are trying to say, but LSU has never been an offensive powerhouse consistently. So it makes no sense to compare a single LSU player's season with previous yearly LSU stats offensively.

Offenses are much more high powered these days. If we aren't breaking some type of LSU offensive record every year, then we aren't keeping up with the rest of the FBS. Those proposed stats that would have put that QB at #7 for td's and #4 for yds (on LSU's all time) would have been just good enough for a #40 ranking this past season and not even in the top half of the FBS in passing td's.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram