- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story series long thread
Posted on 2/5/16 at 10:09 am to Gris Gris
Posted on 2/5/16 at 10:09 am to Gris Gris
Again, I don't remember all the details so I don't know about the shoes but size 12 is not very big and being that both AC and Jason are similar in build to OJ I'm just suggesting there might be an explanation.
My view at the time was based on the presence of substantial DNA at the crime scene, not belonging to OJ or the victims; the scenario I've already pointed out about the limo driver and of course, the gloves.
I never bought the bs about the glove shrinking. The defense knew the gloves wouldn't fit, probably because they knew who they belonged to.
Even the trace amounts of blood in the bronco. The Killer was clearly drenched in blood, how come the bronco which did not appear to have been cleaned have only a couple of trace smudges but then it's dripping off of him going in the front door?
The killer wasn't in the bronco. BUT the killer did enter the compound behind the guess house and he did enter the front door.
IF OJ'S went to the crime scene it was after the fact and either he got back before the limo driver or before the limo driver got out of his car.
The limo driver saw Jason (emerging from the side/back and cross the front yard and enter the front door) who was likely still there when the detectives started ringing the gate bell, which is why lights were on and the detectives thought someone was home.
OJ hired Jason an attorney before he himself was named a suspect and Jason never cooperated with police and was never interviewed.
My view at the time was based on the presence of substantial DNA at the crime scene, not belonging to OJ or the victims; the scenario I've already pointed out about the limo driver and of course, the gloves.
I never bought the bs about the glove shrinking. The defense knew the gloves wouldn't fit, probably because they knew who they belonged to.
Even the trace amounts of blood in the bronco. The Killer was clearly drenched in blood, how come the bronco which did not appear to have been cleaned have only a couple of trace smudges but then it's dripping off of him going in the front door?
The killer wasn't in the bronco. BUT the killer did enter the compound behind the guess house and he did enter the front door.
IF OJ'S went to the crime scene it was after the fact and either he got back before the limo driver or before the limo driver got out of his car.
The limo driver saw Jason (emerging from the side/back and cross the front yard and enter the front door) who was likely still there when the detectives started ringing the gate bell, which is why lights were on and the detectives thought someone was home.
OJ hired Jason an attorney before he himself was named a suspect and Jason never cooperated with police and was never interviewed.
2
Posted on 2/5/16 at 10:27 am to More&Les
The "If I Did it" book says OJ had an unwilling accomplice, pseudonym 'Charlie'
Posted on 2/5/16 at 10:33 am to More&Les
I don't buy the Jason story, though I can see why some people lean toward it. There's just no evidence linking him.
There were 299 pair of those shoes sold in the US in size 12. There's no mention of AC or Jason having them, but there's a picture of OJ in them. He left the bloody prints.
I see your point about not finding more blood in the Bronco. The killer should have been pretty bloody.
For the record, I'm one of a few who thought the prosecution and police bungled things so much that the jury was entitled to find reasonable doubt. However, when the picture of OJ in the shoes was found post trial, that sealed the deal for me. I think had they had that photo in the trial, it would have overcome all the bungling. I also believe the glove shrank. The defense didn't know they weren't going to fit. Had the gloves fit, I think they would have considered putting OJ on the stand, though the risk was huge.
There were 299 pair of those shoes sold in the US in size 12. There's no mention of AC or Jason having them, but there's a picture of OJ in them. He left the bloody prints.
I see your point about not finding more blood in the Bronco. The killer should have been pretty bloody.
For the record, I'm one of a few who thought the prosecution and police bungled things so much that the jury was entitled to find reasonable doubt. However, when the picture of OJ in the shoes was found post trial, that sealed the deal for me. I think had they had that photo in the trial, it would have overcome all the bungling. I also believe the glove shrank. The defense didn't know they weren't going to fit. Had the gloves fit, I think they would have considered putting OJ on the stand, though the risk was huge.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News