- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
6
Posted on 1/20/16 at 11:28 am to CunningLinguist
quote:
per an international regulatory body of scientists
yeah but they're stupid.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 11:31 am to CunningLinguist
PLUTO! PLUTO! PLUTO!
Posted on 1/20/16 at 11:35 am to CunningLinguist
Plus they found like a hundred other sub-planets (or whatever you call them) that are bigger than Pluto. So if Pluto counts, then we need to learn a new really long paragraph to remember the other hundred planet names.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 12:40 pm to CunningLinguist
quote:
Pluto doesn't meet the definition of a planet per an international regulatory body of scientists, not one guy.
If it wasn't ruled by an intergalactic committee it's bullshite.
Pluto deserves representation in the matter.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:18 pm to CunningLinguist
quote:
Pluto doesn't meet the definition of a planet per an international regulatory body of scientists, not one guy.
I said he was the one who worked to make it happen, not that he made the decision. He was the fellow who originally came up with today's criteria for a planet, campaigned for it, and it was subsequently approved by said body.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 8:27 am to CunningLinguist
quote:
Pluto doesn't meet the definition of a planet per an international regulatory body of scientists, not one guy.
Correction, only 5% of astronomers voted on this. Know your facts.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News