Started By
Message

re: Scott Van Pelt's take on Les

Posted on 11/24/15 at 12:08 am to
Posted by tunechi
Member since Jun 2009
10197 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 12:08 am to
quote:

I say this: I'll bet you money that whoever's next at LSU doesn't survive 11 years and doesn't go 110-32. I'll take the under on both of those for the limit.


Odds are he's right
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261634 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 12:09 am to
No doubt he's right.

I think people are just frustrated with the offense, and the inability to beat Alabama.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32899 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 4:42 am to
quote:

quote:
I say this: I'll bet you money that whoever's next at LSU doesn't survive 11 years and doesn't go 110-32. I'll take the under on both of those for the limit.


Odds are he's right


He may be right but he should have also included Les in that prediction
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 7:18 am to
quote:


Odds are he's right


Right because they'll be inheriting a program that is 8 years away from a national title instead of 1 and coached by Les Miles instead of Nick Saban.

Miles inherited a program set up for success. He will be leaving what adds up to a rebuilding project in comparison.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 7:23 am
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 2:50 pm to
Odds are Miles wouldn't sniff a winning percentage of .775 for whatever number of years he would remain at LSU either.

.615 last year and he could be lower this year since he was deprived of a win over McNeese.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram