- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man, this is getting tough to watch.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 4:30 pm to LosLobos111
Posted on 11/12/15 at 4:30 pm to LosLobos111
Put it to ya like this bro..
Last season
CLE played Blazers twice
Lebron played in one game, Portland wins by 19. Lebron don't play CLE win by 5. That took 2 minutes to find. I could find countless more examples of this. You can't say just because PLAYER x would've played that the team would've won no matter who the player is. When you get to having 3-4 even 5 players out then you could mabye make a better argument. One player? NOPE. How do you know AD wouldn't have gone 4 for 20 or 3 for 12 like he has this season. That takes shots away from Bukcy Gordon who was 10-20 or Ryno who was a 7-16.
Last season
CLE played Blazers twice
Lebron played in one game, Portland wins by 19. Lebron don't play CLE win by 5. That took 2 minutes to find. I could find countless more examples of this. You can't say just because PLAYER x would've played that the team would've won no matter who the player is. When you get to having 3-4 even 5 players out then you could mabye make a better argument. One player? NOPE. How do you know AD wouldn't have gone 4 for 20 or 3 for 12 like he has this season. That takes shots away from Bukcy Gordon who was 10-20 or Ryno who was a 7-16.
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 4:33 pm
2
Posted on 11/12/15 at 4:39 pm to Boomshockalocka
I never said that it was a given that if AD played that they would have won...What i did say that it does in fact hurt the team if the best player does not play.
Are you suggesting that Lebron not play anymore because of one game that the team played ok with out him?
Should Aaron Rodgers not have came back after Matt Flynn threw 6 tds???
it's basic logic and also basic common sense
Are you suggesting that Lebron not play anymore because of one game that the team played ok with out him?
Should Aaron Rodgers not have came back after Matt Flynn threw 6 tds???
it's basic logic and also basic common sense
Posted on 11/12/15 at 4:52 pm to Boomshockalocka
Those guys were producing even with him in the lineup with roughly the same shots.
Based on his history it is far far more likely he has a good/great game rather than those 2 games he struggled. Is it a guarantee the pels win with him in the lineup? No nothing is guaranteed but it sure in the Frick gives them a better shot.
Based on his history it is far far more likely he has a good/great game rather than those 2 games he struggled. Is it a guarantee the pels win with him in the lineup? No nothing is guaranteed but it sure in the Frick gives them a better shot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News