re: Sports Illustrated gets it (this time at least)

quote:

---

I know LSU fans always like to consider where someone went to college when evaluating how well they do their job in an unbiased fashion (even if they are completely wrong about where that person actually went to college). With that in mind, consider where Zac Ellis went to college when determining his unbiased opinion of Bama.

---

What a horrible anecdotal argument.

quote:

---

With that in mind, consider where Zac Ellis went to college when determining his unbiased opinion of Bama.

---

bamasgot - it doesn't matter about all that crap that you are spewing. Fact is from Bama's record they don't deserve to be in the top 4 "as of today." You have to get penalized for losing "especially at home" and you guys didn't. You see just about every SEC fan, I will bet including you, says it is hard winning SEC games on the road. So if that is truly the case the winning road team has to get more credit and the losing home team has to be dinged just that little extra. You guys were not dinged at all.

You cannot sit there and say that ur loss was better than Florida's loss, because it was not. You both have the same records and yet you lost to Ole Piss at home and Florida beat Ole Piss! There is NO WAY IN HELL you should be ranked above Florida right now especially with the games to be played going forward. The committee truly did itself an injustice. They should have let the schedule work this issue out for itself then project that Bama is a top 4 team! If Bama beats LSU this weekend then the committee could rationale say "Bama beat LSU, you lost to LSU so Bama is better than Florida" but to say that Bama is better than Florida right now with Bama losing at home to Ole Piss and Florida beating the crap out of Ole Piss. It is just plain bias bullshite!

I can promise you one thing if the roles were reversed with Florida right now Bama and every gump "including you" would be screaming bloody murder!!! It is literally that simple to analyze!!!!