- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Premier League Kit Deals, club by club
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:18 pm
Pretty cool breakdown.
LINK
The Manc deal is absurd. Can't wait for McCraigBro's insight on Nike vs Adidas in soccer.
Pretty amazing how big Chelsea's global brand has become in only about 15 years.
LINK
The Manc deal is absurd. Can't wait for McCraigBro's insight on Nike vs Adidas in soccer.
Pretty amazing how big Chelsea's global brand has become in only about 15 years.
8
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:35 pm to STLhog
City is a small club when it comes down to it
Nike only sponsors one team in the whole league.
quote:
Can't wait for McCraigBro's insight on Nike vs Adidas in soccer.
Nike only sponsors one team in the whole league.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:39 pm to STLhog
Considering Standard Chartered holds the majority of the Gilette and Hicks debt, that number doesn't convey the entire advantage enjoyed by Liverpool by SC being our main sponsor.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:50 pm to STLhog
quote:
Can't wait for McCraigBro's insight on Nike vs Adidas in soccer.
[pulls up a chair]
Posted on 8/12/15 at 1:57 pm to STLhog
quote:
McCraigBro's
Haven't read the article yet, but there is no "r" in my name lol. Don't worry though, it isn't the first time.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:07 pm to STLhog
quote:
Can't wait for McCraigBro's insight on Nike vs Adidas in soccer.
Well Adidas has to go all out with soccer. They have lost some massive US Colleges in recent years (ND, Mich, and TENN) and they quickly becoming nonexistent in basketball. They just lost the jersey deal they had with the NBA.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:15 pm to STLhog
It still blows my mind every time I see the numbers for the Adidas deal with United. I feel like we need to exploit that to get a Ronaldo/Messi signing just because we can do it with those numbers from the deal. Front-load that shite, and let's become OP again.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:30 pm to STLhog
On the overall ranking, was QPR 7th last year?
Aston Villa, West Ham and Newcastle get more from their sponsors than Everton
. Also, over half the league has undisclosed jersey deals.
Aston Villa, West Ham and Newcastle get more from their sponsors than Everton
. Also, over half the league has undisclosed jersey deals.Posted on 8/12/15 at 3:19 pm to STLhog
quote:
I'd argue that Derrick Rose's constant injuries really hurt what could have been a big push for Adidas
This is 100% true. Also as someone who is into shoes quite a bit, Nike is really good at making their athletic shoes also go well with casual life (ie Jordans, Foamposites, Roshe) than any other company is.
Holy shite hahaha. I didn't know United was getting THAT much. That is honestly crazy, but I mean they are a top 3 club in the world popularity wise so they can demand a number like that. Adidas needs the exposure and branding more than Nike does, so I can 100% see why they would dish that much out.
You don't need much branding when you have Jordan, Ronaldo and Lebron on your marketing team.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 3:24 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News