- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Battlefront won't have single player story...
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:19 am
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:19 am
And won't have space fights. Was is gonna make this a futuristic battlefield. I have a feeling it will be a letdown
9
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:25 am to Macintosh504
There is a thread and everyone knows.
Who the hell plays battlefront for the single player?
Who the hell plays battlefront for the single player?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:40 am to Macintosh504
So space fight? Guess id really need to factor in bullet drop based on the gravitational pull on the closes planet.
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 9:40 am
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:48 am to Mystery
quote:
Who the hell plays battlefront for the single player?
:raises hand:
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:48 am to Macintosh504
Someone posted this on Reddit
quote:
PS2 Version:
Clone Wars and Galactic Civil War
Space battles
64 players on PC version (including tons of bots)
30 unique vehicles
26 Maps all with different variants.
Single Player Campaign
23 playable Heroes & Villains
Made by a great developer but the team but destroyed by EA.
EA's next gen triple A game:
Only Galactic Civil War
No Space battles
Only 40 players with no bots.
Only 6 confirmed vehicles. AT-ATs aren't even playable.
Only 4 planets
No Single Player Campaign
Published by EA games.
Good job EA. You've made a sequel to a decade old game with not even half the amount of content as the original. I have no clue how anyone can defend this.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:00 am to HeavyCore
Yea, it is amazing how, as we progress technologically, we receive less and less content from developers.
The tech is moving forward, but the games are going backwards.
Sad.
Maybe someone can explain to me why these games, which are more expensive than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50, have less content than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50.
The fact that the AT-AT isn't drivable is absurd.
The tech is moving forward, but the games are going backwards.
Sad.
Maybe someone can explain to me why these games, which are more expensive than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50, have less content than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50.
The fact that the AT-AT isn't drivable is absurd.
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 10:04 am
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:06 am to Scruffy
quote:
Maybe someone can explain to me why these games, which are more expensive than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50, have less content than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50.
DLC?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:08 am to Teddy Ruxpin
Even with DLC, they are far behind.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:30 am to HeavyCore
I'm not gonna lie, this has me pretty triggered. I love Battlefront and they're cashing out so bad on it.
Can we go start a people wall in front of EA's front office to protest their blatant raping of the gaming community?
Can we go start a people wall in front of EA's front office to protest their blatant raping of the gaming community?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:32 am to Scruffy
How are games more expensive? They are certainly more expensive to make.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:34 am to Mr Gardoki
That is what I am referring to. It cost millions more to make these games, yet they have much less content.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:38 am to Scruffy
Well the details have gone up a lot. Think about all the bitching people do when grass doesn't reflect light properly.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:46 am to Mr Gardoki
Those people are idiots though. People care far too much about graphics.
Gameplay and story >>>> Graphics
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:51 am to Scruffy
I agree but those people have an effect on the bloated budgets
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:52 am to Macintosh504
frick
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:53 am to Mystery
quote:
Who the hell plays battlefront for the single player?
I do Singleplayer > Multiplayer
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:08 am to Rebel Land Shark
quote:
I do Singleplayer > Multiplayer
Then you don't play battlefront.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:10 am to sicboy
Yea battlefront is multiplayer, that's just how it is.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:11 am to Macintosh504
quote:
single player story
Oh my god, who the hell cares.
You'll really miss out on the innovate BF single-player feature of "follow the NPC"
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:11 am to sbr2
Some of us hate interacting with you nerds. We like SP.
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News