- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Arizona and Arizona State football
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:43 am
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:43 am
ESPN recently had an article that Bobby Hurley is considering taking the basketball job at ASU. Other than a win or two, it just seems like the program is maxed. Obviously, the Arizona Wildcats are the premier basketball team in the state. That said, it got me thinking about the two schools and their football teams.
Arizona State has had some success (much more so than Arizona), but it still pales in comparison to USC, Washington, UCLA and now Oregon and probably Stanford.
What's holding these two programs back from really turning to that next level. They both are so incredibly inconsistent. It seems like a 8-4 season at ASU is good and 10-3 is the ceiling. For Arizona, a 7-5 season is good and 9-4 or 10-3 is superb. Arizona is a highly populated state...roughly around 7 million. Arizona borders California, the most populated state. Neither have daunting academic hurdles for their athletes and students. They both play in an elite conference. Is it facilities? Fanbase? Apathy? Recruiting/high school football? What's holding these two (potential gold mines) back?
Arizona State has had some success (much more so than Arizona), but it still pales in comparison to USC, Washington, UCLA and now Oregon and probably Stanford.
What's holding these two programs back from really turning to that next level. They both are so incredibly inconsistent. It seems like a 8-4 season at ASU is good and 10-3 is the ceiling. For Arizona, a 7-5 season is good and 9-4 or 10-3 is superb. Arizona is a highly populated state...roughly around 7 million. Arizona borders California, the most populated state. Neither have daunting academic hurdles for their athletes and students. They both play in an elite conference. Is it facilities? Fanbase? Apathy? Recruiting/high school football? What's holding these two (potential gold mines) back?
This post was edited on 4/9/15 at 10:45 am
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:49 am to Forkbeard3777
Their top talent gets raided
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:06 am to Forkbeard3777
I don't know what it is, but the fans don't seem to give a shite. I lived right off campus for a couple years back around 2012. Live in St. Pete now and the Rays get more hype around town than ASU got on campus, it seemed. Also don't know why they don't have top 15 recruiting classes every year. Tempe 12 ain't doin their job
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:10 am to Forkbeard3777
Both of these guys will trend their programs upward, but as mentioned, both have the loyalty of a Hilton sister. Rod & Co. have a good, young qb and I wouldn't be shocked to see the Cats win the Pac12 within a few years.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:16 am to Forkbeard3777
quote:
What's holding these two programs back from really turning to that next level. They both are so incredibly inconsistent. It seems like a 8-4 season at ASU is good and 10-3 is the ceiling. For Arizona, a 7-5 season is good and 9-4 or 10-3 is superb. Arizona is a highly populated state...roughly around 7 million. Arizona borders California, the most populated state. Neither have daunting academic hurdles for their athletes and students. They both play in an elite conference. Is it facilities? Fanbase? Apathy? Recruiting/high school football? What's holding these two (potential gold mines) back?
For one thing, it's a state with a population filled with transplants. There is no loyalty to staying in-state for college. Any worthwhile recruits always seem to venture elsewhere.
Take a look at the past few recruiting classes for the entire state. This is a breakdown of how many of the top 15 players in Arizona, as rated by Rivals, signed with an out-of-state institution:
2015 10/15
2014 8/15
2013 9/15
2012 10/15
There is little vested interest in staying loyal to the state because I am willing to bet that most athletes weren't born and raised in Arizona. Louisiana has one of the highest proportions of natives to transplants populations of any state in the Union. That is one of the main reasons why the majority of top flight talent typically signs with LSU, as long as LSU is successful.
Homegrown Population Statistics
Only two states have a lower homegrown population percentage: Nevada and Florida. Florida's is due in large part to the influx of Cuban immigrants and the departure of Snow Birds from the Northeast and New England.
On the other hand, 78.8% of Louisiana's population has been born and raised in Louisiana. That's more than twice the percentage of Arizona's native population.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:20 am to Forkbeard3777
quote:
Arizona is a highly populated state...roughly around 7 million.
New York, Illinois, North Carolina, New Jersey, Virginia, Washington, and Massachusetts all have greater populations than Arizona, and none of these states have what I consider to be dominant football programs.
You can argue that the University of Washington has achieved that next level of success, but they haven't done so for quite some time.
And Virginia Tech has also been a highly successful program, but that is due in large part to the achievements of a future hall of fame coach.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:26 am to Forkbeard3777
quote:
Arizona borders California, the most populated state.
Arizona and Arizona State also have to compete against about 20 other major colleges vying for those same recruits.
Within a 1,000 miles of Los Angeles you have the following Division 1 football programs:
Washington
Washington State
Oregon
Oregon State
Cal
Stanford
Fresno State
USC
UCLA
San Diego State
UNLV
Nevada
Boise State
Utah
Both schools have to get in line with everyone else.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:31 am to Forkbeard3777
This may come off as slightly racist, but it shouldn't if you have any sort of common sense, but the lack of elite success also might have to do with population demographics.
Blacks make up only 5% of Arizona's total population. By comparison, look how the majority of the states in the South stack up:
Alabama 26.8%
Arkansas 16.1%
Florida 17%
Georgia 31.5%
Louisiana 32.8%
Mississippi 37.6%
Missouri 12.5%
North Carolina 22.6%
South Carolina 28.8%
Tennessee 17.4%
Texas 12.6%
Just saying...
Blacks make up only 5% of Arizona's total population. By comparison, look how the majority of the states in the South stack up:
Alabama 26.8%
Arkansas 16.1%
Florida 17%
Georgia 31.5%
Louisiana 32.8%
Mississippi 37.6%
Missouri 12.5%
North Carolina 22.6%
South Carolina 28.8%
Tennessee 17.4%
Texas 12.6%
Just saying...
Posted on 4/9/15 at 11:52 am to Forkbeard3777
quote:
Arizona is a highly populated state...roughly around 7 million.
3.4% black population
Posted on 4/9/15 at 12:04 pm to Forkbeard3777
ASU should be top 10 in every major sport. No excuse not to if you can use this recruiting pitch.
>
>
Posted on 4/9/15 at 12:20 pm to Forkbeard3777
It may be sexist, but they need to fins some way to get a sizable percentage of the female student hard bodies to come to the games in force. Then, they start selling alcohol in their stadium. This will give them the raucus, party atmosphere at their games that their university is already known for. This will positively impact recruitment as well as convince other fans to come to the games to see the hard bodies. Dudes follow the hot white girls every time.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 12:43 pm to Forkbeard3777
I think alot has to do with commitment to success. There really hasn't been one at ASU in the past. Money wasn't spent and effort wasn't expended to try to compete. Things do seem to be changing though. Back to back 10-3 seasons and a strong outlook on this season. Stadium renovations in progress, new stadium taxation district to bring in funds, new AD hired from NFL, etc.
Recruiting is trending upwards too. May not be getting all of the higly coveted prospects they fight USC, UCLA, Oregon for but they are getting a few.
Recruiting is trending upwards too. May not be getting all of the higly coveted prospects they fight USC, UCLA, Oregon for but they are getting a few.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 12:55 pm to Forkbeard3777
The two schools really need to market having the hottest coeds of any other colleges in the nation.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 1:52 pm to Forkbeard3777
quote:
Fanbase
At ASU it's the fan base. The university has 80 thousand students but struggles to fill it's 72-thousand seat stadium for any game. Last year's game against Notre Dame did not sell out.
Recruits notice things like that.
It's gotten so bad that they are now in the process of reducing the size of the stadium to somewhere in the neighborhood of 55 K.
When you can't get fans to come to the game you aren't making money. When you aren't making money you aren't spending it to chase recruits or upgrade your facilities.
It's an endless cycle.
ASU will never be a powerhouse until it invests serious money into it's football program.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 3:34 pm to Forkbeard3777
quote:
Arizona State has had some success (much more so than Arizona), but it still pales in comparison to USC, Washington, UCLA and now Oregon and probably Stanford.
What's holding these two programs back from really turning to that next level
That's like asking why ole miss or MSU can't really get to the next level even though bama/auburn/lsu/uga/uf/ut are in their same league.
ASU or UA won't ever be elite, top notch football programs for any prolonged period of time. That's just not who they are.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News