Started By
Message

re: Thailand bans underboob NSFW

Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:50 am to
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:50 am to
What about side boob?

FTR, I am still a firm believer that underboob > side boob. I have never wavered in this.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65049 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:51 am to
quote:

FTR, I am still a firm believer that underboob > side boob


Anyone who says differently isn't right in the head.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64730 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:52 am to
quote:

FTR, I am still a firm believer that underboob > side boob. I have never wavered in this.



I can see your point. But I'll make the counterpoint that if it's a nice set of titties, there is no bad side to them.
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18503 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:52 am to
Thailand has one of the biggest underground sex operations in the world and they gonna worry about an underboob? Yeah, that'll fix the sex trafficking perps too.
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12751 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 8:55 am to
quote:

What about side boob? FTR, I am still a firm believer that underboob > side boob. I have never wavered in this.


I have spent way too much time thinking about this. But then again I am a red blooded heterosexual Amurrican male. Underboob gives the illusion that they can fall out at any moment. Sideboob means they're contained but more is visible. You can side boob with a bra. You can't with under.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram