Started By
Message

re: Do We Still Think Loomis Is a Miracle Worker?

Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:51 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:51 pm to
If we wanted to we literally could have just converted Galette, Graham, Byrd, and Lofton's roster bonuses to get under the cap without cutting one person.

Then the pay cuts easily pay for Ingram and maybe even Browner.

These are football moves, not pure cap moves. Guys that weren't worth their contracts are gone or took pay cuts (minus PT; he was worth his but we were making room for Spiller or Bush).

We could have fielded the same fricking team that went 7-9 and that's what all these complaints seem like they wanted. We are trying to improve and we ain't even close to done. Chill.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:54 pm to
Thank you.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:55 pm to
And for the last fricking time the Graham move LOST us cap space this year. We didn't get rid of him to get under. And Graham is the ONLY great player we lost (PT was still good but is passing his prime).

We only lost four fricking players, added two, AND kept Ingram. What do people want? Did the Graham trade frick up everyone's minds?

And we got another first round pick for crying out loud.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 8:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram