Started By
Message

re: I still am not sure how UVa and Duke are both getting 1 seeds?

Posted on 3/9/15 at 1:42 pm to
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139891 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 1:42 pm to
I am still not sold on the idea of both getting 1 seeds, although people have made good arguments on both sides.

I also think winning the regular season and a conference tourney title like Wisconsin and Arizona have the chance to do should weigh heavily in that. Championships should matter, as they completed what was asked of them to do.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 1:57 pm to
Yeah, to be clear, I'm not arguing that Duke shouldn't be a #1, just that I'm reluctant to call them a lock. No one outside of Kentucky is a lock, mainly because there's five teams just about even for three slots. Though I like Arizona's resume more than some. Yes, it doesn't have the volume of wins, but it is in the same ration, and that's just the reality of a west coast team. We run into this every year. West coast teams just don't get as many chances to show their quality. But Arizona has done so within the limits of their schedule, limited by geography. It's not like they scheduled nothing but cupcakes.

I'm still trying to figure out how Kansas is #2 in the RPI. And what seed they are going to get. They'd be a 2-seed you'd pray you'd get. Sort of the anti-Wisconsin.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram