Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: X=6/2(2+1)

Posted on 2/27/15 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 3:00 pm to
A(B+C)shows the multiplying (AB+AC). If you do that operation first, which is completely acceptable since multiplication takes place at the same time as division in order of operations, then the parenthesis are now in the denominator. There is NOTHING that states you must do the division in the equation before distributing that A across the argument in the parenthesis except left to right. That's how people come up with 1. You state that you need to show the parenthesis around the entire denominator to do that operation first. I'm saying that you have to put the parenthesis around (6/2)to do that operation first. You are only doing that operation first because you are reading left to right. That is not enough to define the order of operations.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 3:10 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35241 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

There is NOTHING that states you must do the division in the equation before distributing that A across the argument in the parenthesis except left to right. That's how people come up with 1. You state that you need to show the parenthesis around the entire denominator to do that operation first. I'm saying that you have to put the parenthesis around (6/2)to do that operation first. You are only doing that operation first because you are reading left to right. That is not enough to define the order of operations.
What? When there are two operations at the same level of the hierarchy, you work left to right. That's not an assumption; that is how math is solved.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram