- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New Most Expensive Painting Ever:
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:01 am
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:01 am
LINK
Paul Gaugin's Nafea Faa Ipoipo (When Will You Marry?) $300 Million
Previous:
Paul Cezanne The Card Players $274 Million
Paul Gaugin's Nafea Faa Ipoipo (When Will You Marry?) $300 Million
Previous:
Paul Cezanne The Card Players $274 Million
12
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:04 am to LuckySo-n-So
I wouldnt give you $30 for that
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:08 am to LuckySo-n-So
I have paintings at home that are nicer.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:08 am to LuckySo-n-So
At least it's not some abstract piece of shite. Looking at you, Jackson Pollock, you turd.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:12 am to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
Nafea Faa Ipoipo
I thought is was going to translate:
Are you having trouble going poo poo
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:17 am to LuckySo-n-So
I would pass over that painting if I saw it at a flea market.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:20 am to LuckySo-n-So
Boy With Apple
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:42 am to LuckySo-n-So
The "art" of being an "artist" is getting people to pay you obsurd amounts of money so you can participate in a hobby you enjoy.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:47 am to LuckySo-n-So
stuff like this is why i will never understand art. clearly you are buying the art because of the painters history... right? this is nothing special. and if it is, that just proves the point that I will never understand art
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:57 am to LuckySo-n-So
Sorry but the Gaugin looks amateurish. Look at the weird angle on the foot. It looks like something I would do and if you saw it without the reference of who did it, would think it suggested a lack of talent.
Also, the two subjects look like they belong in another painting with a different background. It looks like the background here was stolen from a low quality cartoon.
The Cezanne I like.
Also, the two subjects look like they belong in another painting with a different background. It looks like the background here was stolen from a low quality cartoon.
The Cezanne I like.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 8:58 am to LuckySo-n-So
Love Gaugin and his Tahitian phase. Saw the exhibition in Cleveland a few years ago and was blown away. I am willing to speculate this painting was bought by Qatari royalty, but I'm not 100% sure.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 9:30 am to LuckySo-n-So
Those are both great pieces of art
Posted on 2/7/15 at 9:37 am to LuckySo-n-So
Art is one of these things I just don't really understand.
That pic reminds me of what is, or perhaps, was the most expensive picture ever taken:
That pic reminds me of what is, or perhaps, was the most expensive picture ever taken:
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News