Started By
Message

re: Who was the better sniper: Hathcock or Kyle

Posted on 1/25/15 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by indytiger
baton rouge/indy
Member since Oct 2004
9848 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 12:38 pm to
Can't compare the 2. Different generations.

I hate how people bring technology into the argument. Do you want Kyle to say "frick it, I want people to think I'm as good as Hathcock", and leave all his shite at base and just go hunting taliban with an old deer rifle?
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51474 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 12:43 pm to
Hathcock didn't just use an "old deer rifle".
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

an old deer rifle


Those pre 64 Winchester Model 70s are a bit more than just a deer rifle.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Can't compare the 2. Different generations. I hate how people bring technology into the argument. Do you want Kyle to say "frick it, I want people to think I'm as good as Hathcock", and leave all his shite at base and just go hunting taliban with an old deer rifle?


I agree 100%

Same thing with sports. You can't fault or tout somebody just because they lived at a certain time. All you can do is judge them based on that time period because that is all we will ever know. We will never know what Hathcock would have done with today's tech over in Iraq or Afghanistan. And we also will never know what Kyle would have done with older rifles in Vietnam. All you can do is compare them against their competition at the time
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram