- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rolling over 401K to new job
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:50 am to Broke
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:50 am to Broke
So let's do a calculation.
$20,000, 5% compounded annually for 30 years.
If he rolls into a trad/401k he ends up with $86,438.85
If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85
If he uses the balance and his tax bracket is 15% he ends up with:
$73,473.02
Which is what I've been saying all along. You want to throw taxation into a discussion about balance. And you're wrong.
$20,000, 5% compounded annually for 30 years.
If he rolls into a trad/401k he ends up with $86,438.85
If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85
If he uses the balance and his tax bracket is 15% he ends up with:
$73,473.02
Which is what I've been saying all along. You want to throw taxation into a discussion about balance. And you're wrong.
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:52 am to Broke
Your quote:
quote:
ETA: Ever looked at a Roth balance vs a traditional IRA balance after 20-30 yrs?
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:01 pm to Broke
quote:
If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85
He pays the tax when he rolls into the Roth, which is right now. So he doesn't have $20,000 anymore, and won't end up with $86,438.85. I know you are aware of this.
I don't know why you made the comment earlier about taxation being "another matter" when it's central to the choice of what to do with the money. Maybe the confusion has arisen from you taking my use of "balance" in that post and interpreting it outside of the thread.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 10:41 am to Broke
quote:
So let's do a calculation. $20,000, 5% compounded annually for 30 years. If he rolls into a trad/401k he ends up with $86,438.85 If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85 If he uses the balance and his tax bracket is 15% he ends up with: $73,473.02 Which is what I've been saying all along. You want to throw taxation into a discussion about balance. And you're wrong.
I think most of the confusion in this thread can be seen above. I was wrong by using the term "balance" in this context. I was looking for a word to describe the amount of money in the account, comparing a lump sum rolled from a 401k into a tIRA/401k vs rolled into a Roth. The amount you would have, the balance in the account, (considering the cash outlay it the back at the point of conversion) when you start to withdraw, including the tax paid the following tax year on your return. This included two points of potential taxation, the rolling, and the withdrawing. It's hard to know exactly because no one knows the relative tax rates, but most assumptions end up with the Roth being the better option, especially if, like the OP, you've got a long time until retirement.
I'm sorry if this didn't come across in my posts.
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 10:45 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News