Started By
Message
locked post

House votes to save A-10 fleet

Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:01 pm
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45821 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:01 pm
LINK

quote:

The House on Thursday approved a proposal to scrap the Air Force's recommendation to retire the A-10 close air support planes.

Adopted 300-114, the amendment to the 2015 defense appropriations bill offered by Reps. Ron Barber (D-Ariz.) and Candice Miller (R-Mich.) would prevent any elimination of the A-10, also known as the "Warthog," fleet.

Air Force officials have said that retiring the plane would save $4 billion. But supporters of the A-10 fleet argued that there is no equivalent plane ready to to provide troops with close air support.
"With what's happening in Iraq and the Middle East, eliminating the A-10s is the wrong move," Miller said during House floor debate.


Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:02 pm to
The Army is ready to fly them if USAF does not want to.

However, USAF is never going to allow USA pilots to fly fixed-wing combat aircraft (except drones, of course.)

Posted by Rawdawgs
Member since Dec 2007
910 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:05 pm to
The ISIS mission is what this plane was built for. The need to send these guys and elevendy million rounds of ammo.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:06 pm to
Some generals are gonna be pissed when their kickbacks get eliminated.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:07 pm to
Shouldn't the recommendations from the military be solely about combat necessity and the legislative branch worry about the price tag?

Seems like that flip-flopped here.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126964 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:11 pm to
I think the A-10 is a cool weapon but how is congress qualified to tell the Air Force what planes it needs??

The army is keeping its A-10's, right? And the army is the branch of service which knows when and where it will need close air support for its troops.

Bad move by congress, IMO.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51383 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:13 pm to
I am confused.

The Air Forces recommends to cut a plane. Congress says that they will not cut it.

That makes no sense, especially given the ever decreasing number of vets serving in Congress.

I wonder with Congressman's district produces the plane.
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 3:15 pm to
Maybe the most durable close-support airframe in the history of aviation. Can't believe they ever wanted to scrap it.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68215 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 4:01 pm to
I understand that machines get old and wear out but if we had to replace these,

could the Super Tucano fill this role?
This post was edited on 12/2/14 at 4:33 pm
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 10:37 pm to
Go Warthogs!
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125462 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 2:18 am to
frick that POS F-35

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram