Started By
Message

re: Nola's 25 page and 25' proposed non-smoking ordinance

Posted on 11/20/14 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171078 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

It asserts there is "no legal or constitutional 'right to smoke'" and "business owners have no legal or constitutional right to expose their employees and customers" to secondhand smoke. "On the contrary, employers have a common law duty to provide their workers with a workplace that is not unreasonably dangerous," it says.


plenty of non smoking places to work. pansies.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39608 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It asserts there is "no legal or constitutional 'right to smoke'" and "business owners have no legal or constitutional right to expose their employees and customers" to secondhand smoke. "On the contrary, employers have a common law duty to provide their workers with a workplace that is not unreasonably dangerous," it says.


With this logic, we might as well shut down all commerce.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram