Started By
Message

re: Oregon thinking outside of box -- Free Tuition

Posted on 11/19/14 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18470 posts
Posted on 11/19/14 at 3:31 pm to
Alright. Point still stands. The state covering tuition helps, but will 3% of income over 20 years be more or less than the tuition cost? Is this actually saving money on tuition in the long run?

Does it hurt the student in the long run to have this 20 year responsibility plus an extra loan with high interests rates to cover room and board and books?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32742 posts
Posted on 11/19/14 at 4:18 pm to
The schools are banking on the 3% for 20 years equaling more than typical tuition fees, which is a good bet if the only people taking advantage of this are graduating with worthwhile degrees, but I'm not sure that would be the case.

I've only been out of school for 4.5 years, but I extrapolated what I would pay back (3%) for my 4.5 years worked, plus another 15.5 years if my salary increased by 4% yearly (seemed like an appropriate number) and came out to ~$63,000. Which is close to 3-4 times what I paid in tuition.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1485 posts
Posted on 11/19/14 at 10:07 pm to
It is more than the cost of tuition if you have a decent career but that is the point. The student would decide to partake in this form of funding for a college education that would not require money upfront. For that opportunity, you pay it back/forward for the next generation of students.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram